Posted: 23 Mar 2013 09:02 PM PDT
Forget the World's
Fair, we now have a new way to celebrate human accomplishment. Instead of
seeing a vision of the future, we turn off the lights and sit in the dark for
an hour.
Earth
Hour shows how far we have come from celebrating human accomplishment to
celebrating the lack of accomplishment as an accomplishment. For all the
pretense of activism, environmentalism celebrates inaction. Don't build,
don't create and don't do-- are its mandates. Turn off the lights and feel
good about how much you aren't doing right now.
Environmentalism has degenerated into a conviction that all human activity is
destructive because the species of man is the greatest threat to the planet
and all life on it. Each death, each act of undoing and unmaking, each
darkness that is brought about by the cessation of humanity becomes a
profoundly environmentalist activity.
Kill yourself and save the planet. Put out the lights, tear down the city and
let the earth revert to some imaginary primeval paradise free of all
pollution; whether it is the carbon breath of men, dogs and cows or the light
pollution of their cities.
Embrace the darkness.
While we take electric light for granted-- being able to read and write after
dark is a technological achievement that transformed our civilization.
Animals are governed by day and night cycles. Artificial light made it
possible for us to work independently of the day and night cycle.
During the recent extended blackout after Hurricane Sandy, some of us had a
brief period of reverting to a pre-technological civilization in which work
was governed by day and night cycles. And that was a reminder that there is
no way to measure the increase in knowledge gained from the conquest of the
darkness. There is no better measure of the unthinking contempt of the
environmentalist movement for that achievement than a call to turn off the
lights and sit in the dark.
Like all environmental gimmicks, Earth Hour is perverse and hypocritical. Far
more energy is consumed promoting it, then is saved by practicing it.
Websites switch to black, even though displaying black on television sets or
monitors consumes more energy. Turning off electricity to entire buildings
after working hours and then turning it on costs more than letting it run.
And getting 90 million people across the country to turn their power on and
off at a scheduled time is an energy savings disaster. And since power
companies draw down on their more expensive 'green' generators first, Earth
Hour actually shuts down 'green' power.
But its sponsors don't claim that Earth Hour saves energy or prevents us from
polluting the globe. Like every environmentalist stunt from flying rock stars
around the world on jet planes to carving thousands of statues made of ice
and then leaving them to melt in a public square, Earth Hour is meant to
spread awareness.
Spreading awareness is the sole purpose of most environmental activism.
Awareness spreading doesn't make anything better, but makes people feel
guilty, outraged, hopeful or some combination of the appropriate political
sentiments in the face of an imminent armageddon that can only be fought by
convincing everyone to be deeply concerned by it and disdainful of everyone
who stands outside their Chicken Little consensus.
The WWF, Earth Hour's godmother, has learned that shrill attention seeking is
a reliable fundraising method. One of the WWF's more memorable fundraising
methods was an ad that showed hundreds of planes headed toward the World
Trade Center, to highlight just how much more important their work is than
fighting terrorism. Franny Armstrong of Age of Stupid, which was promoted by
the WWF, ran a 10:10 campaign in the UK, whose ads featured environmentalists
murdering dissenters, including a group of schoolchildren. The ads are just
ads, but London's leftist former mayor, Ken Livingstone had said of Age of
Stupid, "Every single person in the country should be forcibly sat down
on a chair and made to watch this film."
That is the dark side of environmentalism. The most active non-Muslim
domestic terrorist group is environmental. The undercurrent of violence finds
easy purchase in environmentalism's creed that the only real problem with the
world is people. No amount of turning off the lights is enough. Eventually
you come around to having to turn off the people.
The Nazis were among the most enthusiastic environmentalists of their day,
even the term 'Ecology' was coined by Ernst Haeckel, whose racial views
served as precursors to Nazi eugenics. But while Nazi environmentalist
believed that we were all animals, they insisted that some animals were
better than others. Modern environmentalists believe that we are all worse
than animals. In their view we are both natural and unnatural. Natural
because we come from the ape and unnatural because we are intelligent. We
live on the planet, but our intelligence excludes us from ever belonging to
it.
The incompatibility of productive man with the natural world is a fundamental
tenet of the environmental movement. Everything we do is destructive, because
of what we are. We are tool builders, inventors and producers. And the
environmentalist movement is aimed at convincing us to stop being these
things. To turn off the lights, make do with less and march back to the caves
with a few clever ad campaigns and a catchy tune.
Zero Population campaigns and calls for mandatory one-child
families are the eugenics of environmentalism. The old eugenicists were
concerned with improving the human breed by promoting the reproduction of
some, and preventing the reproduction of others. Environmental eugenics
treats all of mankind as an inferior race. We all must die.
Not only mankind must go, but all the animals that man has domesticated and
bred-- cows, dogs and cats. That is why PETA kills thousands of dogs and cats
a year, promotes the euthanasia of wild cats and pet spaying and its staffers
have even been known to kidnap animals and then kill them. It is why the
Global Warming crowd has made cow emissions into their whipping bovine.
It's not enough to kill man, tear down his cities and put out his lights. His
cats and dogs and his cows and sheep must also die.
Environmentalism is not motivated by a love for all creatures, but by
preference for a prehuman world of natural wilderness uncultivated by man.
The political leftist romanticizes the noble savage over the civilized man
and its environmentalist arm romanticizes the jungle over the thousand acre
farm. It prefers the the swamp to the garden, the wolf to the dog, and the
tiger to the house cat.
This preference is not scientific, it is emotional, rooted in an antipathy to
industrialization and human development. It wraps itself in the cloak of
science, but it is a reactionary longing for a romanticized past that never
existed.
In the environmental bible-- man is the source of all evil. The transition
from the nomadic to the domestic, the village to the city, and the craftsman
to the factory, is its version of original sin.
The environmentalist began with a distaste for human civilization and the
fetishization of the rural farm life of the peasant. The champions of this
"naturalism" were invariably urban artists and writers from the
upper classes who were enthusiastic about being in touch with nature. After
them came the "Nature Fakers" crafting myths about the high moral
standards of wild animals. Domestic animals in such stories were always
wicked and dumb, while wild animals lived deep and spiritual lives out in the
woods. And so the animal kingdom was subdivided into the noble savage and the
uncle tom.
The world was divided into two polar opposites, the green and the gray, in an
apocalyptic struggle. Either man would drown the world in industry, or he
would return to a natural way of life through a lethal virus (Mary Shelley,
The Last Man, 1826), a devastating war (H.G. Wells), oppressive social
policies (Edward Bellamy) or eco-terrorism (The Monkey Wrench Gang). The more
civilization grew, the more apocalyptic the scenarios became culminating in
the two great environmental myths; nuclear winter and global warming. These
apocalyptic myths have served the same purpose for environmentalists as
apocalypses do for all religions. They predict a time when the sinful order is
overturned and the earth is renewed to make way for the faithful.
Man is the environmentalist's devil. He must be beaten, broken and
subjugated. Even the animals he has bred, who are the spark of his genius,
must be taken out and killed. Take away his food and his power. Blame him for
the natural cycles of the planet and the inevitable extinction of species
that goes on whether he is there or not. Take away his technology and his
inventions. Tell him that the humblest bacteria is better than him, for it is
dumb and follows its natural instincts, while he insists on using his mind.
Take away his primacy and his learning. And then leave him in the dark.
The
environmental movement is tenacious, fanatical and deceptive. Its creed is
the undoing of all human progress. There is money to be made from that, as
there is in all revolutions, but beneath the inconveniences of living under
an environmental regime, from dirty clothes to high taxes, while being forced
to listen to the hypocrisies and false pieties of the Gorean clergy of
environmentalist activists heating their mansions while the poor freeze in
energy poverty, is the darker reality that environmentalism is an anti-human
movement with a vicious hostility toward man and the civilization he has
built. Whatever he has built, it must destroy.
The gap between darkness and light is a profound symbol in every
civilization. The light of knowledge pitted against the shadowy dark of
ignorance. The light reveals, but the darkness hides.
Civilization and the moral code exist in the light of awareness, but the
darkness is home to unthinking bestial things. To call for a return to the
darkness is a profound act of symbolism. A civilization that celebrates a
return to the darkness for even a single hour is longing for a return to a
deeper state of darkness. A darkness of the soul.
Daniel Greenfield is a New York City based writer and blogger
and a Shillman Journalism Fellow of the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment