Being a proud Atheist, and a freedom loving INFIDEL AKA "KUFFAR", WE are threatened by the primitive pidgeon chested jihad boys in the medieval east.
FRACK YOU!! SAY US ALL!! Don't annoy the Pagans and Bikers,, it's a islam FREE ZONE!!! LAN ASTASLEM!!!!
An Examination of Muhammad’s Relationship with a Nine-Year-Old Girl
For the Western mind, perhaps the most disturbing fact about Islam is
that its founder had a sexual relationship with a nine-year-old girl.
Because of this, it has become increasingly popular in some circles to
refer to the Prophet of Islam as a "pedophile." This is, of course,
extremely offensive to Muslims, who view Muhammad as the ideal servant
of God and as the greatest example of what a man should strive to be.
Nevertheless, Muhammad’s relationship with a young girl presents a
problem for Muslims, especially for those who want to share their faith
with others.
Since much of the following
information will come as a shock to those who are unfamiliar with this
issue, we must be careful not to jump to hasty conclusions about
Muhammad. Pedophilia is one of the most serious charges that can be
leveled against a person, so the term "pedophile" should not be used
lightly. We must also remember that, if a man has a sexual relationship
with a young girl in a culture where such a union is permissible, this
doesn’t necessarily mean that the man is a "sexual predator," as the
term "pedophile" implies. Christians especially should be wary of
flippant name-calling. With that said, let us carefully examine
Muhammad’s relationship with Aisha, recalling the Western principle that
a man is innocent until proven guilty.
FIRST MUSLIM DEFENSE: Aisha was older than nine years old.
Faced with the arguments of Western critics, Muslim apologists
sometimes piece together information from various accounts in an attempt
to deny that Aisha was as young as critics often claim:
The popular misconception as to Aishah’s age may be removed here. . . .
Isabah, speaking of the Holy Prophet’s daughter Fatimah, says that she
was about five years older than Aishah. It is a well-established fact
that Fatimah was born when the Ka’bah was being rebuilt, i.e., five
years before the Call. Aishah was therefore born in the year of the Call
or a little before it, and she could not have been less than ten years
at the time of her marriage with the Holy Prophet in the tenth year of
the Call. . . . And as the period between her marriage and its
consummation was not less than five years, because the consummation took
place in the second year of the Flight, it follows that she could not
have been less than fifteen at that time. The popular account that she
was six years at marriage and nine years at the time of consummation is
decidedly not correct because it supposes the period between the
marriage and its consummation to be only three years, and this is
historically wrong.[1]
RESPONSE: The evidence for Muhammad’s marriage to the nine-year-old Aisha is too strong to be ignored.
The problem with the selective and carefully edited defense just given
(other than the complete lack of references) is that it ignores the
numerous accounts we now possess which record Aisha’s age when Muhammad
consummated his marriage to her. Many of these accounts are from Aisha
herself. Indeed, the evidence for Muhammad’s marriage to the young Aisha
is as strong as the evidence for just about any other fact in Islam. We
have copious traditions relating Muhammad’s marriage proposal when
Aisha was six or seven years old, as well as his consummation of that
marriage when she was nine:
Aisha
(may Allah be pleased with her) narrated that the Prophet (may the
blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) married her when she was six
years old, and he consummated her in marriage when she was nine years
old. Then she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).[2]
Khadijah died three years before the Prophet (the blessing and peace of
Allah be upon him) departed to Madina. He stayed there for two years or
so and then he married Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age,
and he consummated that marriage when she was nine years old.[3]
Urwa narrated: The Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon
him) wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years
old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years.[4]
Aisha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah’s Apostle (may peace
be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to
his house when I was nine years old.[5]
Aisha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Allah’s Apostle (may
peace be upon him) married her when she was seven years old, and she was
taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were
with her; and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years
old.[6]
This is just a sample of the early Muslim traditions reporting
Muhammad’s marriage to the young Aisha, but it is sufficient to show
that she certainly wasn’t fifteen years old at the time of the
consummation, as some Muslims claim.
(For a fuller treatment of the early evidence regarding Muhammad’s marriage to the young Aisha, click here.)
In addition to traditions regarding Aisha’s age, the Hadith also
provides details about how the relationship began and progressed:
Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated that the Prophet (the
blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) said to her: "You have been
shown to me twice in my dream. I saw you pictured on a piece of silk and
someone said (to me), ‘This is your wife.’ When I uncovered the
picture, I saw that it was yours. I said: ‘If this is from Allah, it
will be done.’"[7]
After having this dream about Aisha, Muhammad proceeded to ask her
father Abu Bakr for her hand in marriage. Abu Bakr understandably
objected at first, but Muhammad was able to persuade him to agree. Aisha
was later taken to Muhammad’s house:
The Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) asked Abu
Bakr for Aisha’s hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said: "But I am your
brother." The Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him)
said: "You are my brother in Allah’s religion and His Book, but she
(Aisha) is lawful for me to marry."[8]
Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated: The Prophet (the
blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) married me when I was a girl of
six (years). We went to Madina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith
bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair
grew (again) and my mother, Umm Ruman, came to me while I was playing in
a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her,
not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and
made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when
my breathing became all right, she took some water and rubbed my face
and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I
saw some Ansari women who said: "Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and
good luck." Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the
marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah
be upon him) came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to
him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.[9]
Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated: When the Prophet (may
the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) married me, my mother came
to me and made me enter the house (of the Prophet) and nothing surprised
me but the coming of Allah’s Apostle to me in the forenoon.[10]
Once Aisha was a part of Muhammad’s household, she became his favorite
wife, even after he married several other women. Indeed, Muhammad’s
other wives had to plead with him for treatment equal to that of Aisha:[11]
The wives of Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon
him) were in two groups. One group consisted of Aisha, Hafsa, Safiyya
and Sauda; and the other group consisted of Umm Salama and the other
wives of Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him).
The Muslims knew that Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah
be upon him) loved Aisha, so if any of them had a gift and wished to
give it to Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon
him), he would delay it, till Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of
Allah be upon him) had come to Aisha’s home . . . The group of Umm
Salama discussed the matter together and decided that Umm Salama should
request Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) to
tell the people to send their gifts to him in whatever wife’s house he
was. . . . [Muhammad replied]: "Do not hurt me regarding Aisha, as the
Divine Inspiration did not reveal it to me on any of the beds except
that of Aisha." . . . Then the group of Umm Salama called Fatimah, the
daughter of Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon
him) and sent her to Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be
upon him) to say to him: "Your wives request to treat them and the
daughter of Abu Bakr on equal terms."[12]
Thus, Aisha held a place of special favor among Muhammad’s wives, which
caused a great deal of tension among the women. Since it may be taken
as historically certain that Aisha was very young when her marriage to
Muhammad was consummated, critics sometimes charge that Muhammad’s
preference for Aisha reveals his preference for young girls. The Hadith
offers a certain amount of support for this view:
When I took the permission of Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace
of Allah be upon him), he asked me whether I had married a matron. He
said: "Why hadn’t you married a virgin that would play with you, and you
would play with her?" I replied: "O Allah’s Apostle! My father died and
I have young sisters, so I felt it not proper that I should marry a
young girl like them who would neither teach them manners nor serve
them."[13]
Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated: I used to play with the
dolls in the presence of the Prophet (may the blessing and peace of
Allah be upon him), and my girl friends also used to play with me. When
Allah’s Apostle (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) used
to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the
Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) would call
them to join and play with me.[14]
Nevertheless, it must be noted that, if Muhammad had truly been
obsessed with young girls, he could have taken many others as his wives.
Muhammad eventually held complete power in Medina and later in Mecca,
yet he didn’t build himself a harem of young girls. Since there isn’t
enough evidence to support the charge that Muhammad had a perverted
obsession with prepubescent girls, critics should be careful when making
such a claim.
To sum up, the evidence makes it
abundantly clear (1) that Muhammad had sexual intercourse with Aisha
when she was very young, (2) that this relationship was pursued by
Muhammad after he dreamed about her, and (3) that she was his favorite
wife. With so much historical data reporting the age of Aisha, it should
be obvious that Muslims who deny Muhammad’s relationship with her only
do so out of embarrassment.
SECOND MUSLIM DEFENSE: Morality is relative to one’s culture.
Another method of defending Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha is the Muslim appeal to moral relativism.
According to this view, since different cultures have different
standards of morality, it is wrong to criticize the standards of others
based on one’s own ethical system. Consider the following responses by
Maqsood Jafri and Abdur Rahman Squires:
The Arabs practiced polygamy. In the wake of custom the Prophet
Muhammad married some ladies. Hazrat Khadijah was fifteen years older
[than] him at the time of marriage. Most of them were his age sake. In
his fifties he married Hazrat Aiysha, the daughter of Hazrat Abu Bakr
when she was just bloomed to youth. Hinting this marriage some of the
orientalists charge Prophet Muhammad as a "pedophile". It was not only
the Prophet Muhammad who had married a young girl [but] even the father
of Hazrat Aiysha, Hazrat Abu Bakr had also married a young girl in his
sixties. It was . . . part of the prevalent Arab culture and custom.
Hence not to be taken seriously.[15]
The large majority of Islamic jurists say that the earliest time which a
marriage can be consummated is at the onset of sexual maturity (bulugh),
meaning puberty. Since this was the norm of all Semitic cultures and it
still is the norm of many cultures today—it is certainly not something
that Islam invented.[16]
Thus, since the practice of marrying young girls was "part of the
prevalent Arab culture and custom," it is "not to be taken seriously" as
a criticism of Islam.
RESPONSE: Islam is utterly inconsistent with moral relativism.
This defense is truly amazing, for, when defending Muhammad’s moral perfection, Muslims often maintain that Muhammad condemned the Arab culture for the prevalent immorality:
After spending his life in such chaste, pure and civilized manner,
there comes a revolution in [Muhammad’s] being. He wearies of the
darkness and ignorance, corruption, immorality, idolatry, and disorder
which surround him on all sides. . . . He wants to get hold of that
power with which he might bring about the downfall of the corrupt and
disorderly world and lay the foundations of a new and better one. . . .
He wanted to change the whole structure of society which had been handed
down to them from time immemorial.[17]
Muslims are quick to point out immorality around the world, especially
in the West. It seems, then, that they are suggesting a very
inconsistent message. When confronted with an immoral practice in
another culture, Muslims cry out in one accord, "We condemn these
practices, for they are against the eternal, perfect, and unalterable
Law of God!" Yet, whenever the moral character of Muhammad is being
scrutinized, Muslims suddenly say, "Don’t judge Muhammad! You should
remember that he was from a different culture! Marrying young girls was
common in Arabia, and it still is, thanks to Muhammad’s precedent.
Different people have different moral standards, so no one should worry
about Muhammad’s sexual relationship with a nine-year-old girl."
This convenient switch from moral absolutism to moral relativism is
logically unacceptable. If it is wrong to judge the practices of another
culture, then both Muhammad and the Qur’an were wrong for condemning
immoral practices in Arabia. But if condemning immoral practices is
acceptable, then Muslim apologists need a better response to criticisms
of Muhammad’s relationship with Aisha.
THIRD MUSLIM DEFENSE: Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha was part of God’s plan.
Muslim apologists have developed another answer to Muhammad’s critics,
namely, that Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha was part of God’s divine plan
(i.e. God had an important reason for it):
It should be borne in mind that, like all acts of the Holy Prophet (may
peace be upon him), even this marriage had a Divine purpose behind it.
Hazrat Aisha was a precocious girl and was developing both in mind and
body with rapidity peculiar to such rare personalities. She was admitted
to the house of the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) just at the
threshold of her puberty, the most impressionable and formative period
of her life. It was the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) who
nurtured her sensibilities and directed the growth of her faculties to
the most fruitful channel and thus she was made to play an eminent role
in the history of Islam. Moreover, she was the only virgin lady to enter
the House of the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) and was thus very
competent to share the feelings of other ladies of younger age who had
numerous questions to ask from the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him)
with regard to sexual ethics and morality. These ladies felt shy of
asking them through the elderly wives of the Holy Prophet (may peace be
upon him) out of modesty. They could speak out their minds comparatively
more freely to Aisha who was more or less of their own age group.[18]
Puberty is a biological sign which shows that a woman is capable of
bearing children. Can anyone logically deny this? Part of the wisdom
behind the Prophet Muhammad’s marriage to Aishah just after she reached
puberty is to firmly establish this as a point of Islamic Law, even
though it was already a cultural norm in all Semitic societies
(including the one Jesus grew up in).[19]
Here Muslim apologists argue that Muhammad married Aisha for a divine
purpose. Young girls who had questions about sex needed someone to talk
to, and who better for this task than the young wife of the Prophet?
Further, Muhammad wanted to establish puberty as an appropriate age for
marriage, so he decided to demonstrate this rule by marrying Aisha.
RESPONSE: Muslims have failed to offer a sufficient reason for God to ordain the marriage.
There are numerous problems with this defense. First, such a response
could be used to justify nearly any behavior. Consider a husband on
trial for beating his wife. When he takes the stand, he explains, "Your
Honor, many women are victims of spousal abuse, and they need someone to
talk to. Out of the kindness of my heart, I decided to beat my wife, so
that she would be able to comfort other women whose husbands beat
them." Such an explanation would never be accepted (except, perhaps, in
countries under Islamic rule, where the Qur’an guarantees a husband’s right to beat his wife[20]). Besides, if Muhammad had outlawed
sex with children instead of becoming a willing participant, little
girls wouldn’t have to worry about sex, and they wouldn’t need to
question Aisha.
Second, it isn’t necessary for a
lawgiver to institute laws by performing actions that create a
precedent. In other words, Muhammad didn’t need to marry a young girl in
order establish a law about marrying girls who had reached puberty. Muhammad,
as Islam’s lawgiver, could have simply issued a decree. For instance,
Muhammad allowed husbands to beat their wives. Was it necessary for
Muhammad to beat his wives in order to establish this as a law?
Certainly not. Similarly, when an American lawmaker says that killing
someone in self-defense is acceptable, no one argues that the lawmaker
must go out and kill someone in self-defense if his law is to stand.
Hence, the argument that Muhammad needed to marry a young girl to
establish puberty as the appropriate age for marriage completely fails.
Third,
the Muslim claim that Aisha was a "precocious child" strains the
evidence. Aisha herself reports that, when she was taken to Muhammad’s
house, she was playing on a swing with her friends. She was also still
playing with dolls. Based on the evidence, Aisha sounds like a normal
little girl, not like a young adult. Besides, Muhammad didn’t marry her
because she was precocious; he married her because he was dreaming about
her.
Fourth, it is
unlikely that God was using Muhammad’s relationship with Aisha to
establish puberty as the appropriate age for marriage, since the Qur’an
itself seems to allow marriage to prepubescent girls. According to Surah
65:4, a man must wait three months to divorce a wife who hasn’t yet
reached menses. If Islam allows a man to divorce a girl who isn’t old enough to have her period, it follows that Islam also allows a man to marry
a girl who hasn’t yet reached menses. And if the Qur’an allows marriage
to prepubescent girls, then Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha would in no
way rule out such a practice. (In the spirit of interpretive charity,
I’m open to alternative interpretations of the Qur’an here. That is, I’m
willing to give Muslims the benefit of the doubt if they offer another
reasonable view of this passage. Based solely on 65:4, I would say that
several interpretations of the text are possible. However, if we
consider early Muslim commentaries on the verse, the understanding I
give above appears strongest. To read these commentaries, click here.)
Fifth,
Muslims search for reasons to justify Muhammad’s relationship with
Aisha because they are convinced that everything Muhammad did had a
divine purpose behind it. When critics point out Muhammad’s numerous
murders and assassinations, Muslims claim that these violent acts were
just. When critics note the extent of Muhammad’s polygamy, or his
participation in the slave-trade, or his countless robberies,[21]
Muslims provide answers based on the view that Muhammad was an
outstanding moral example. Similarly, when Muslims are confronted with
the evidence for Muhammad’s sexual encounters with Aisha, they assume
that there must have been a reason for it. They then invent reasons for
Muhammad’s behavior (i.e. the other little girls needed someone to talk
to about sex), and they offer these reasons as a defense of Muhammad’s
morality. However, non-Muslims do not share this confidence in
Muhammad’s moral perfection. Indeed, when non-Muslims hear about
Muhammad’s violence, his greed, his polygamy, and his support of spousal
abuse, we aren’t as quick to say "He must have had a reason" as Muslims
seem to be. Because of this, Muslim justifications for Muhammad’s
marriage to Aisha sound hollow when presented as a logical defense of
his actions.
Finally,
Muslim explanations for Muhammad’s behavior fail to take into account
the dangers that accompany sex at a young age. Many Muslims claim that,
as soon as a young girl gets her first period, she is ready to bear
children. This "old enough to bleed, old enough to breed" mentality,
aside from being disgusting, is completely false. A nine-year-old girl
isn’t ready for sex or children, even if she reaches menses earlier than
other little girls. Children that young are still growing; when they
become pregnant, their bodies divert nutritional resources to the
developing fetus, depriving the growing girls of much-needed vitamins
and minerals. Further, complications often result from adolescent
pregnancies, because the bodies of the young girls simply aren’t ready
to give birth.
The
West has discerned the dangers posed by adolescent pregnancies. Muslim
apologists often claim that marriage to young girls was common in
biblical times. This may be correct, but it is because these marriages
were part of the culture, not because God endorsed them. Whereas many
Christian countries have recognized the potential harms brought on by
pregnancies among adolescent girls and have raised the legal age for
marriage, Muslim countries are often kept from such advancements because
of Muhammad. This is very interesting, for Muslims often claim that
Muhammad was scientifically enlightened and that the Qur’an is a scientific masterpiece.[22]
In reality, Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha is injuring young girls across
the Middle East and North Africa. The dangers have even been noted by
the United Nations, which issued the following report in an attempt to
curb the practices supported by Islam:
Traditional
cultural practices reflect values and beliefs held by members of a
community for periods often spanning generations. Every social grouping
in the world has specific traditional cultural practices and beliefs,
some of which are beneficial to all members, while others are harmful to
a specific group, such as women. These harmful traditional practices
include female genital mutilation (FGM); forced feeding of women; early
marriage; the various taboos or practices which prevent women from
controlling their own fertility; nutritional taboos and traditional
birth practices; son preference and its implications for the status of
the girl child; female infanticide; early pregnancy; and dowry price.
Despite their harmful nature and their violation of international human
rights laws, such practices persist because they are not questioned and
take on an aura of morality in the eyes of those practicing them.
Child
marriage robs a girl of her childhood-time necessary to develop
physically, emotionally and psychologically. In fact, early marriage
inflicts great emotional stress as the young woman is removed from her
parents’ home to that of her husband and in-laws. Her husband, who will
invariably be many years her senior, will have little in common with a
young teenager. It is with this strange man that she has to develop an
intimate emotional and physical relationship. She is obliged to have
intercourse, although physically she might not be fully developed.
Health
complications that result from early marriage in the Middle East and
North Africa, for example, include the risk of operative delivery, low
weight and malnutrition resulting from frequent pregnancies and
lactation in the period of life when the young mothers are themselves
still growing.
Early
pregnancy can have harmful consequences for both young mothers and
their babies. According to UNICEF, no girl should become pregnant before
the age of 18 because she is not yet physically ready to bear children.
Babies of mothers younger than 18 tend to be born premature and have
low body weight; such babies are more likely to die in the first year of
life. The risk to the young mother’s own health is also greater. Poor
health is common among indigent pregnant and lactating women.
In
many parts of the developing world, especially in rural areas, girls
marry shortly after puberty and are expected to start having children
immediately. Although the situation has improved since the early 1980’s,
in many areas the majority of girls under 20 years of age are already
married and having children. Although many countries have raised the
legal age for marriage, this has had little impact on traditional
societies where marriage and child-bearing confer "status" on a woman.
An
additional health risk to young mothers is obstructed labor, which
occurs when the baby’s head is too big for the orifice of the mother.
This provokes vesicovaginal fistulas, especially when an untrained
traditional birth attendant forces the baby’s head out unduly.[23]
Contrary
to Muslim claims, a nine-year-old girl just isn’t ready for sexual
intercourse or for its possible ramifications (i.e. pregnancy, giving
birth, breast-feeding, and raising a child). It is unnecessarily
dangerous, for a much safer relationship could be crafted if the
marriage were to take place several years later, when the girl reaches
her late teens. Muslims may respond to this by arguing, "But Aisha never
became pregnant, so none of this matters." Yet it does matter. Every
year, countless young girls, still playing with dolls, are taken to live
with much older husbands. If these husbands were to be challenged, they
wouldn’t respond by saying, "But it’s part of Arabic culture"; instead,
they would reply, "It can’t be wrong, because Muhammad did it." In
other words, even if we grant the bizarre claim that Aisha was somehow
ready for sex and marriage, most nine-year-old girls aren’t ready
for sex and marriage. Yet the practice of marrying children continues
to this day in many Muslim countries, largely because Muslims hold up
Muhammad as their highest role model.
FOURTH MUSLIM DEFENSE: The average lifespan in Muhammad’s day was so low that people had to marry young.
Osama
Abdallah argues that Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha was understandable
because people in Muhammad’s day needed to marry early:
Life
1400 years ago was very rough in the too hot desert. From my personal
knowledge, the average life span back then was 50 years. People used to
die from all kinds of diseases. Both parents of Prophet Muhammad (peace
be upon him) for instance, died natural deaths before he even knew them.[24]
On
this view, since people could die at any time in the "hot desert," they
would get married at a very early age to make sure they had as many
years together as possible.
RESPONSE:
Muhammad was already more than fifty years old when he consummated his
marriage to Aisha, so there was no need for him to marry such a young
girl.
Abdallah’s
claim might make sense if Muhammad had been nine or ten years old when
he married Aisha. But the Prophet of Islam was already well advanced in
years. He was far closer to death than any young woman he might marry,
so why not marry a young woman instead of a young girl? Why not marry a
fully developed twenty-year-old instead of a little girl playing on a
swing? By marrying Aisha when she was so young, Muhammad was, in effect,
condemning her to a life of widowhood, for the Qur’an prohibited the
marrying of Muhammad’s widows (33:53). Beyond all this, Abdallah’s
argument ignores the facts. Muhammad didn’t marry Aisha because the
average life span was fifty years old; instead, he married her because
(1) he had been dreaming about her, and (2) he had the power to persuade
Abu Bakr to give him his daughter in marriage.
FIFTH MUSLIM DEFENSE: Other people have done it too—even Christians!
Abdallah also employs an "everybody’s doing it, so it’s okay" defense:
Not
only was it a custom in the Arab society to Engage/Marry a young girl,
it was also common in the Jewish society. The case of Mary the mother of
Jesus comes to mind. In non biblical sources she was between 11-14
years old when she conceived Jesus. Mary had already been "BETROTHED" to
Joseph before conceiving Jesus. Joseph was a much older man. Therefore
Mary was younger than 11-14 years of age when she was "BETHROED" to
Joseph. We Muslims would never call Joseph a Child Molester, nor would
we refer to the "Holy Ghost" of the Bible, that "Impregnated" Mary as a
"Rapist" or "Adulterer.".[25]
RESPONSE: Besides committing the "tu quoque" fallacy, this defense misses the point of the criticism against Muhammad.
Tu quoque
is a type of fallacy that attempts to ignore a criticism because of
some hypocrisy found in the critic. For instance, suppose I’m a thief.
One day, I catch someone stealing my car, and I say, "Stop, Thief!" If
the person stealing my car turns to me and says, "But you’re a thief
too, so it’s not wrong for me to steal," he will be committing the tu quoque fallacy.
Muslims rely heavily on the tu quoque.
When people criticize Islam for terrorism, it’s common to hear Muslims
say, "But Americans are killing Arabs!" as if this were a meaningful
response to the charge. Likewise, when someone says, "Look at all the
people Muhammad killed," Muslims respond by saying, "But people were
killed in the Bible too."
To
say that Joseph married a young girl in the Bible does nothing to
address the problem of Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha. At best, such a
defense would only show that Christians are being inconsistent. But in
reality, the Muslim defense doesn’t even show this, since their
comparison fails for several reasons.
First,
there is no real historical data reporting the age of Mary when she
married Joseph. True, given the custom of the time, she was probably
fairly young, perhaps as young as twelve or thirteen. But since we have
no historical references to her age, we can’t rule out the possibility
that Mary was twenty years old. The point here is this: people criticize
Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha based on what we know (i.e. that Aisha was nine years old), whereas Muslims reply based on what we don’t know (i.e. the age of Mary).
Second,
we must not forget that thirteen years old is very different from nine
years old. Nine-year-old girls typically haven’t reached menses. In a
best case scenario, a girl that young may have entered the beginning
stages of puberty. A thirteen-year-old girl, on the other hand, may be
coming to the end of puberty. Thus, even if we grant a young age for
Mary, there would still be a world of difference between her and Aisha.
Third,
Muslim apologists seem to miss the fact that Joseph is not the standard
of morality in Christianity. When critics point to the age of Aisha,
they are arguing something like this: "You’re trying to tell me that
Muhammad was the greatest moral example of all time and that I should
believe everything he says? I can’t believe that a person who would have
sex with a little girl was the greatest man ever." More simply,
Muhammad is foundational to Islam. If there is a problem with
Muhammad, there is a problem with Islam. If Muhammad was immoral, then
it becomes difficult to take his teachings seriously. Thus, it makes no
sense for a Muslim to say, "Well, Joseph married a young girl too."
Joseph isn’t foundational to Christianity. If an ancient text were found
tomorrow, and this ancient text proved that Joseph was a thief and a
murderer, this wouldn’t affect Christianity at all, because Christians
don’t consider him to be a prophet, or a bringer of revelation, or even
an important figure in Christianity. Thus, if Muslims want to show that
Christians are being inconsistent, they need to show that Jesus, or
Peter, or Paul, or someone central to Christianity, did the things that
Muhammad did. Fortunately, Jesus was sinless, and the apostles lived
exemplary lives once they had committed themselves to Jesus.
The
internet is filled with examples of Muslims responses of this sort.
Muslim websites constantly note that young girls are married in various
countries and that these young girls sometimes give birth. No one doubts
this. The problem is that this has nothing to do with whether or not
marriage to a nine-year-old girl is morally acceptable for a mighty
prophet. The fact that Muslims are forced to resort to an "everyone’s
doing it" defense shows that they have run out of responses.
ASSESSMENT:
While the evidence isn’t enough to condemn Muhammad as a "pedophile,"
his sexual relationship with Aisha is unacceptable.
Muhammad
has been accused of pedophilia in numerous writings, sermons, and
conversations. We have seen that the earliest Muslim traditions offer
support for this view. However, the evidence sustaining the charge of
pedophilia is perhaps too limited to warrant such a harsh conclusion. We
know that Muhammad had a sexual relationship with a young girl, and
that this was reprehensible. Yet we must take cultural differences into
consideration in formulating an accurate appraisal of a person’s
character. In Muhammad’s society, sexual intercourse was acceptable when
a girl reached menses, and Muhammad may have waited until Aisha had
reached this age. (Note: There’s no good historical evidence that
Muhammad waited for Aisha to reach menses. However, I think it’s
important to be generous in our interpretations as much as possible, so
I’m willing to grant, for the sake of argument, that Aisha had reached
puberty.)
Similarly,
we don’t have enough information to call Muhammad a "pervert." While
Muhammad’s sexual acts may seem startling, we don’t know enough about
the nature of these acts to condemn him as a sexual deviant or a
predator.
Nevertheless,
Muslims are too hasty in dismissing Muhammad’s relationship with Aisha.
We can’t simply ignore a prophet’s marriage to a nine-year-old girl.
Muslims view Muhammad as the highest example of a moral life, but his
marriage to Aisha conflicts with that view. If they want to put Muhammad
forward as the standard of morality, Muslims need to come to terms with
the many questionable things Muhammad did, as well as the awful impact
of these actions.
There
is a simple, but highly explicit, way to evaluate the importance of
Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha. We must begin by trying to get a mental
picture of a morally perfect man. For Muslims, this will include all the
things they have been taught about Muhammad. According to their
picture, he is kind, generous, patient, humble, and trustworthy. He
protects orphans and widows, endures persecution, helps the needy, and
promotes justice. He prays faithfully, fasts regularly, and obeys God in
everything. He is loyal to his friends and patient with his enemies. He
never gives in when tempted with evil. Now we must picture that same
man in a room with an innocent little girl. He takes away her doll,
climbs on top of her, and puts his penis inside her. She doesn’t know
what is happening because she is too young to know much about sex.
Frightened and confused, she cries because of the pain and bleeds on her
bed, but she tries to remain quiet out of respect for her new husband,
who, in return, endangers her life.
If
a person is able to keep the same vision of moral perfection throughout
that description, he may have the faith necessary to be a Muslim. But
if his vision of the perfect man is at odds with what Muhammad did on
numerous occasions, he will need to look elsewhere for an ideal human
being.
Notes: [1] Maulana Muhammad Ali, Muhammad the Prophet (St. Lambert: Payette and Sims, 1993), pp. 183-184. [2] Sahih Al-Bukhari, Dr. Muhammad Matraji, tr. (New Delhi: Islamic Book Service, 2002), Number 5133. See also 5134. [3] Ibid., Number 3896. [4] Ibid., Number 5158. [5] Sahih Muslim, Abdul Hamid Siddiqi, tr., Number 3310. [6] Ibid, Number 3311. [7] Sahih Al-Bukhari, Number 3895. See also Number 5078. [8] Ibid., Number 5081. [9] Ibid., Number 3894. [10] Ibid., Number 5160. [11]
The Qur’an commands husbands to treat their wives equally (4:3), a
command that Muhammad clearly violated. Of course, the same verse also
forbids husbands to marry more than four women, but Muhammad received a
revelation granting him immunity from this law (33:50). [12] Ibid., Number 2581. [13] Ibid., Number 2967. [14] Ibid., Number 6130. [15] Professor Maqsood Jafri, "On The Character of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)." [16] Abdur Rahman Squires, "The Young Marriage of Aishah." [17] Abul A’la Mawdudi, Towards Understanding Islam (Islamic Circle of North America, 1986), pp. 53, 56. [18] Sahih Muslim, Note 1860 (p. 716). [19] Squires, "The Young Marriage of Aishah." [20]
According to the Quran, "Men are the maintainers of women because Allah
has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of
their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the
unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear
desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places
and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them;
surely Allah is High, Great" (v. 4:34, M.H. Shakir Translation). [21] For references, see "Islam Beheaded." [22] For more on this, see "Talking Ants and Shrinking Humans." [23]
Office of the High Commissioner for Human rights, Fact Sheet No. 23,
"Harmful Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and
Children." (Online source) The actual report is much longer than the selections quoted here. [24] See http://www.answering-islam.com/aisha.htm. [25] Ibid.
The Organization of Islamic Cooperation and its Role in Enforcing Islamic Law
We need to get off Saudi Barbarian OIL!!!!!Support the Canadian OIL Sands,,, and visit,, Ethicaloil.org
The gravity of the existential threat we face from Islamic Jihad is truly of epic proportions. It is essentially a battle pitting free-civilized man against a totalitarian barbarian. What is at stake is the struggle for our very soul - namely who we are and what we represent. The lives that were sacrificed for individual rights and freedoms that we've come to cherish are being chiseled away from right under our noses by the stealth jihadists. And many of us are in denial and totally clueless.
The left's appeasement and pandering to evil is nothing new. What makes their utopian delusions so infuriating and unpardonable is that it is not only they who will have to pay the consequences, and deservedly, so, they are thwarting and undermining our best efforts at resistance and are thus dragging us down in the process as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment