|
|
|
From the Desk of Richard Thompson
|
|
|
Last week, the British Press reported that fast food giant
Subway has removed ham and bacon from 200 outlets, and switched to
preparing meat according to halal (Muslim) rules, to please its Muslim
customers. This means that after the butcher shouts "Allah
Akbar," he slaughters the animal by slitting its throat and
windpipe causing it to bleed to death.
How would Winston Churchill have reacted to the news?
Winston Churchill referring to Islam, in 1889, wrote, “No stronger
retrograde force exists in the world.” And at the 1921 Cairo
Conference, commented: “They hold it as an article of duty, as well
as of faith, to kill all who do not share their opinions and to make
slaves of their wives and children … Austere, intolerant, well armed, and
bloodthirsty.”
The Ottoman Empire aligned itself with Germany in WWI and declared jihad
against France and Great Britain. Just a few decades later,
Muslims of the Middle East again aligned with Germany against the
West. The Grand Mufti of Arab Palestine al-Husseini served as a
Nazi propagandist, encouraging Muslims in Europe to lead armed revolts
and attacks on Allied interests.
Churchill took the lead in warning about Nazi Germany. His steadfast
refusal to surrender inspired the British resistance to Hitler during the
difficult early days of the War when Britain stood alone. For his
wisdom and courage as a defender of freedom, Churchill was the first
person to be made an honorary citizen of the United States.
Fortunately, in WWI and WWII our military might defeated German and
Muslim alliances.
However—TODAY— dominance over the West is once again the focus of Radical
Islam. The tactics are subtler than all-out military conflict, and
appear to be more successful. It is a stealth jihad waged
within our borders that takes advantage of the dominance of political
correctness in a sea of indifference to the dangers radical Islam
poses:
- Last month, a UK
politician was arrested for and charged with a racially aggravated
crime after quoting Churchill’s criticism of Islam in a speech;
- Britain’s the Law
Society released guidelines for drafting Sharia compliant legal
contracts.
- In 2011, a report
documented the rise of Europe’s “no-go” zones, many of which
“function as microstates governed by Islamic Sharia law.” Included
in the report were the 751 sensitive urban zones across France where
the French government has completely lost control. “No-go” zones are
also present in Germany, Norway, Sweden, Italy, Belgium, and the
Netherlands.
But, bowing to Islam isn’t just confined to Europe. It’s
occurring here in the US as well.
For instance, through the continuous capitulation to the demands of the Council
on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and other pro- Islamic groups, any
criticism of Islam is deemed offensive and banned:
- The University of
Michigan cancelled a screening of a documentary entitled “Honor
Diaries”(video) which details the truth about the
brutal violence against women perpetrated in the name of Islam.
- Brandies
University withdrew an honorary degree from Ayaan
Hirsi Ali (video) because her work to
protect and defend the rights of women and girls includes truthful
criticism of Islamic law’s justification for rape and beatings.
- A Colorado high
school led students in the recitation of the U.S. Pledge of
Allegiance in Arabic, saying, “one nation under Allah.”
(Allah is not the same as the Judeo-Christian God.)
- Numerous Islamic
terrorism experts are now banned from speaking at government
counter-terrorism classes and conferences.
- The FBI has purged
876 pages and 329 presentations that were deemed offensive to Islam,
and the Pentagon ordered all training material used by military
professional colleges and combat units scrubbed of any content
offensive to Islam.
- And the list goes
on…
In 1998, at an Ohio youth conference, Sheikh Yusuf
al-Qaradawi said, “We will conquer Europe, we will conquer
America.” As al-Qaradawi’s conquest continues to creep across Europe
and into the US, we must ask ourselves, what would Churchill do?
How would Churchill react to American Universities forfeiting their
identities as centers of free speech and open discussion to the pressures
of organizations like CAIR? What would he say abut government
agencies unable to identify the enemy because of political correctness?
Would Churchill have allowed his country to ignore the evidence of the
murderous ideology of Radical Islam because of political correctness or
because some Islamists asked him to?
What would Churchill do?
|
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment