The Only Sane Response |
Posted: 10 Jan 2015 02:18 AM PST
H/T to ACT! for
Canada.
"These guys are dead," says Mark Steyn, "because
back in 2005, these Danish cartoons were published in an obscure Jutland
newspaper, and a bunch of fanatics went bananas and
started killing people over them. So a couple of publications on the planet,
including mine in Canada, and Charlie Hebdo in Paris, published these
cartoons...Le Monde didn't, and the Times of London didn't, and
the New York Times didn't, and nobody else did. And as a result, these
fellows in Charlie Hebdo became the focus of murderous rage. If
we'd all just published them on the front page and said 'If you want to
kill us, you go to hell, you can't just kill a couple of obscure Danes,
you're going to have to kill us all,' we wouldn't have this problem.
But because nobody did that, these Parisian guys are dead. They're dead. And
I've been on enough, I've been enough events in Europe with less famous
cartoonists than these who live under death threats, live under armed guard,
have had their family restaurant firebombed — it's happened to a Norwegian
comedian I know — have come home and found their home burned, as a Swedish
artist I know happened to. And all these people doing the phony hashtag
solidarity, screw your phony hashtag solidarity. Let's have some real
solidarity — or if not, at least have the good taste to stay the hell out of
it.”
He's absolutely right. The only sane response to this kind of attack is for every publication to publish the cartoons. "To honor those who've died for Free Speech," says Bosch Fawstin, "I don't raise my pen up in the air, I put it to paper and draw Mohammad." |
Posted: 09 Jan 2015 02:50 PM PST
Dr. Tina Magaard — a Sorbonne-trained
linguist specializing in textual analysis — published detailed research
findings in 2005 (summarized in 2007) comparing the foundational texts of
ten major religions. Magaard concluded from her hard data-driven analyses:
The texts in Islam
distinguish themselves from the texts of other religions by encouraging
violence and aggression against people with other religious beliefs to a
larger degree. There are also straightforward calls for terror. This has long
been a taboo in the research into Islam, but it is a fact that we need to
deal with.
Magaard added some detail:
There are 36
references in the Koran to expressions derived from the root qa-ta-la, which
indicates fighting, killing or being killed. The expressions derived from the
root ja-ha-da, which the word jihad stems from, are more ambiguous since they
mean “to struggle” or “to make an effort” rather than killing. Yet almost all
of the references derived from this root are found in stories that leave no
room for doubt regarding the violent nature of this struggle. Only a single
ja-ha-da reference (29:6) explicitly presents the struggle as an inner,
spiritual phenomenon, not as an outwardly (usually military) phenomenon. But
this sole reference does not carry much weight against the more than 50
references to actual armed struggle in the Koran, and even more in the
Hadith.
- Excerpted from an article by Andrew Bostom. Read the whole article here. |
No comments:
Post a Comment