|
Summary
The attacks of 9/11 were
conducted against the U.S. homeland with support from the Islamic
Movement inside the United States. The U.S. government's
response to fight on battlefields overseas, while leaders of the U.S.
Islamic Movement exclusively provided "advice" to our
leaders, led to strategic defeats in Afghanistan and Iraq despite the
fact the U.S. military crushed the enemy on the battlefield.
Why? How did this
happen?
The United States lost and
is losing this war today because, contrary to U.S. warfighting
doctrine, the United States government has failed to identify the
enemy we face and the doctrine they use as the basis for why they are
fighting.
The enemy clearly
articulates that sharia
(Islamic Law) is the basis for everything they do.
Now the United States is
re-engaging in Afghanistan using some of the same leaders who crafted
the losing war strategy in the first place, who still have not
defined the enemy, using the same allies who are still our enemies
(eg Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, et al), while ignoring the massive jihadi
network in the United States, which is the primary front for our
enemy in this war.
Then
(Post 9/11)
After 9/11, President Bush
stated the purpose for our operations in Afghanistan was to
"make it more difficult for the terror network to train new
recruits and coordinate their evil plans," and that U.S.
military actions are "designed to clear the way for sustained,
comprehensive and relentless operations to drive them out and bring
them to justice."
During the entire Bush
administration the United States never defined the enemy. Yet,
the administration and all key government agencies were primarily
advised by Muslim Brotherhood leaders which led to the United States
writing constitutions for Afghanistan and Iraq (2005) creating
Islamic Republics under sharia (Islamic Law), thus achieving Al
Qaeda's objectives in those two countries.
That is when we lost the
war.
Now
(August 2017)
In announcing renewed
military operations in Afghanistan, President Trump stated the
objectives of this endeavor include: "Attacking our
enemies, obliterating ISIS, crushing Al Qaeda, preventing the Taliban
from taking over Afghanistan, and stopping mass terrorist attacks
against America before they emerge."
First, if we kill all ISIS
fighters, the Global Islamic Movement will roll on. This is
bigger than merely ISIS, Al Qaeda and the Taliban.
As UTT reported on Monday
in its article "US
Islamic Movement Enters Final Stage" the U.S. Muslim
Brotherhood and its allies INSIDE the United States are experiencing
the culmination of six decades of work domestically to overthrow our
nation. At the same time, the State Department is meeting with
representatives of Hamas doing business as the Council on American Islamic
Relations (CAIR) which raises grave concerns.
Mr. Trump's original
instincts were correct. He should stick with his gut. We
should not engage in Afghanistan as his National Security Advisor and
others recommend.
This is a strategic
distraction from the real war here at home.
The pattern we see between
the U.S. government response after 9/11 and today are very similar:
9/11:
Jihadis attack the homeland
using airliners killing nearly 3,000 Americans.
Response:
U.S. fails to define the
enemy in any of its national security documents. U.S. military
attacks targets in Afghanistan, while using U.S. Muslim Brotherhood
leaders as primary advisors on how to fight the war.
Result:
Strategic loses in
Afghanistan and Iraq. Significant gains for Islamic Movement
inside the U.S.
Today: U.S. Islamic Movement in "Final
Stage" of its Civilization Jihad using hard-left Marxists as
leading edge of their violent actions.
Response: U.S. fails to define the enemy in any of
its national security documents. National Security Advisor
Herbert McMaster demonstrates no knowledge of enemy doctrine
(sharia). U.S. Launches renewed military operations in
Afghanistan, while failing to pursue the MB and designate it a
terrorist organization. The U.S. government continues to allow
the MB to operate in the open in the United States.
Result: While the U.S. puts its strategic focus
on Afghanistan, the cooperating Islamic and hard-left/Marxist Movements
will achieve the intentional outcome of their campaign
- increased civil disorder, chaos, and a high likelihood of open
civil war.
The Islamic Movement in the
United States includes over 3000 Islamic centers/mosques, over 800
Muslim Student Associations (MSA) on every major college/university
campus, over 255 Islamic Societies, and many others as has been
detailed in previous UTT reports. Nearly all of the jihadi
attacks on the United States in the last 16 years, including the
attacks of 9/11, had direct support from this network.
The 9/11 attacks had direct
support from Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar.
Yet, this network remains
untouched by the Department of Defense, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, the Department of Homeland Security.
If the United States
government wants to thin the jihadi herd, as the President states is
his desire, he can begin with dealing with the mothership of their
Movement - the US Council of Muslim Organizations (USCMO) - and
jihadi leaders inside America like Nihad Awad, Ibrahim Hooper,
Oussama Jamal, Salam al Marayati, Mohamed Magid, Azhar
Azeez, Javaid Siddiqi, Sayyid Syeed, Muzammil Siddiqi, and so
many others, as well as those aiding and abetting them like the
President of the Southern Poverty Law Center Richard Cohen and the
entire SPLC, and Congressmen Keith Ellison and Andre Carson.
|
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment