In this mailing:
- Majid Rafizadeh: When Feminists
Join Islamist Terrorists
- Amir Taheri: Kissinger's
Analysis of Mideast is Full of Loopholes
by Majid Rafizadeh • August 20,
2017 at 5:00 am
- The
fact is that these supposed feminists not only turn a blind
eye to those atrocities, but their presence at these events
actively endorses and legitimizes the rule of these dictators.
- When
the subject turns to the specific cases of millions of
oppressed women around the world -- such as Asia Bibi, a
Christian mother on death row in Pakistan for seven years for
taking a drink of water; or the 19-year-old who, this year,
was raped by her cousin at gunpoint and then sentenced to
death by stoning for "adultery"; or women who were forced
to marry their rapists; or child marriages at 12,000 a day;
or women who are beaten by their husbands or who have acid
thrown in their faces; or women used as suicide bombers.
- When
Mogherini smiles in her hijab in Iran, she is delivering a
strong blow to women rights movements that attempt to remove
the compulsion of the obligatory hijab and grant women equal
autonomy, education and freedom. She is empowering
suppression.
During her
visit to Iran this month, Federica Mogherini (left), the current
High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and
Security Policy, rubbed elbows with men who have ordered the deaths
of thousands of women (and men). Does she ever think about hundreds
of people being executed, often after sham trials, every year, and
based on the Islamist laws in this country? (Image source: European
Commission)
The social democrats and so-called feminists have
been raising their voices for all to hear. They boast about
advocating gender equality, individual rights, and advancing
women's rights. They argue that these values are universal; that
every person, especially every woman, everywhere in the world, is
entitled to these "inalienable" rights. Speeches are
given, fundraisers are held, and an army of champions charges toward
the cause.
Everyone is equal, and everyone deserves these
rights. The chants, the inspirational lectures, the determination
that echoes through television interviews, and is spread across the
pages of magazines, all fill their followers with enthusiasm. But
what is the reality?
by Amir Taheri • August 20, 2017
at 4:00 am
Henry
Kissinger in 2008. (Image source: World Economic Forum/Wikimedia
Commons)
Whatever one might think of Henry Kissinger's view
of the world, not to mention his contribution to international
debate during the past six decades, one thing is certain: He has
his own matrix for measuring right and wrong in policy terms.
That matrix is balance of power, a European concept
developed during the medieval times that reached canon status with
the so-called Westphalian treaties to organize relations among
emerging nations in Europe. Call him a "one trick pony"
if you like, but you will also have to admire Kissinger's
consistency in promoting foreign policy as a means of stabilizing
the status quo regardless of moral -- let alone ideological --
considerations. In his version of Realpolitik, the aim should be to
freeze rather than try to change the world, something fraught with
dangerous risks.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment