|
Steven Emerson,
Executive Director
|
December 29, 2017
|
|
Foolishness
at the BOP: Allowing a Terrorist to Radicalize Others
by Patrick Dunleavy
IPT News
December 29, 2017
|
|
|
Share:
|
Be the
first of your friends to like this.
Fool me once, shame
on you, fool me twice, shame on me. That saying may best describe the
Federal Bureau of Prisons administrators who operate the New York City's
Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC). How foolish were they? Well, they
gave the inmates there the blueprints to make a bomb. And if that wasn't
stupid enough, they also gave them radical Islamic literature by noted
terrorists Osama bin Laden and Anwar al-Awlaki. These were no ordinary inmates who had all this material while in
custody. One was an ISIS sympathizer, one was an al-Shabaab member, and
another was convicted of attacking U.S. military personnel in Afghanistan.
How did this fiasco occur you ask, as if this storyline couldn't get any
worse? The materials were distributed by convicted terrorist Ahmad Khan
Rahimi, better known as the Chelsea Bomber. Rahimi was in MCC awaiting sentencing
in January after he was convicted of setting off two improvised explosive
devices in 2016, one in New York and one in New Jersey. A third device set
by Rahimi failed to detonate. The bomb that exploded in the Chelsea
neighborhood in New York City injured more than a dozen people. Luckily, no
one was killed.
This egregious breach in prison security protocol was outlined last week
in a letter from Acting U.S. Attorney Joon H. Kim,
Southern District of New York, to U.S. District Judge Richard Berman. Among
the security breaches Kim informed the court of was that Rahimi was
"attempting to radicalize fellow inmates" other inmates.
Investigators found the radical literature on Rahimi's electronic devices,
and he received copies back during the discovery process.
It is no surprise to learn that terrorists radicalize other inmates.
Numerous reports during the last decade identified cases of people
radicalized in prison both in the United States and abroad. Several
government reports have also identified specific factors that contribute to
radicalization in prison. Among them were convicted terrorists who have
gained notoriety by their crimes and exerted influence on other inmates.
Another factor in the radicalization process was inmate access to extremist
literature by radical Islamists. Several years ago, the Investigative
Project on Terrorism discovered that tapes of Anwar al-Awlaki's sermons
were available in the Bureau of Prisons' inmate library. In 2011, I
testified before the House Committee for Homeland Security on the subject
of Islamic radicalization in the U.S. prison system. I told the committee then that I would not be surprised
if a copy of al Qaida's Inspire magazine was found in prison.
Several copies of Inspire were among the jihadist literature found
in the Metropolitan Correctional Center inmates' cells, Kim's letter said.
So what caused this breakdown in security procedures now?
It's not like MCC has never had to deal with incarcerated terrorists
before. Over the last 25 years it has held numerous high profile terrorists
within its cavernous walls in lower Manhattan, including the 1993 World
Trade Center bombers.
Nor is it the first time terrorists have been able to obtain contraband
items there. In November 2000, al-Qaida members Mamdouh Salim and Khalfan
Khamis Mohamed were held in MCC for the bombing of the United States
embassy in Tanzania. They attempted to escape by stabbing prison guard
Louis Pepe with a sharpened comb they had hidden in their cell in order to
gain possession of the officer's cell block keys and escape. In the ensuing
struggle, Pepe was stabbed in the eye and suffered a traumatic career
ending disability.
Prisons are dangerous places and the people who work in them realize the
risks every time they go to work. Housing terrorists in the same prisons as
ordinary criminals exponentially increases the security threat both outside
the prison and within. Authorities shouldn't heighten the risk by becoming
lax in security measures. Consistent vigilance is a prerequisite to
operating a secure prison.
Someone in MCC should have reviewed the material prior to giving it to
inmate Rahimi. Yes, inmates are allowed access to legal papers. But those
papers containing material that would jeopardize the security of the
facility (bomb making instructions) they are held in a secure location
outside the general population.
Defendants in child pornography cases cannot bring such images into
their cells.
In terrorism prosecutions like Rahimi's, a failure to examine his
belongings allowed him to distribute the material to the other inmates in
the jail mosque during Jummah services. Where was the Muslim chaplain while
this was happening, or the security personnel assigned to cover the
services? Bringing a Quran into the prison mosque is acceptable. Bringing a
copy of Inspire magazine or writings by Anwar al-Alwlaki is not.
Someone has to be held accountable. If not, the likelihood of being
fooled again just went up.
IPT Senior Fellow Patrick Dunleavy is the former Deputy Inspector
General for New York State Department of Corrections and author of The Fertile Soil of Jihad. He currently
teaches a class on terrorism for the United States Military Special
Operations School.
Related Topics: Prosecutions
| Patrick
Dunleavy, prison
radicalization, Metropolitan
Correctional Center, Bureau
of Prisons, Ahmad
Khan Rahimi, Chelsea
bombing, Inspire
magazine, Anwar
al-Awlaki, Joon
H. Kim, Louis
Pepe, Mamdouh
Salim, Khalfan
Khamis
|
The IPT accepts no funding from
outside the United States, or from any governmental agency or political or
religious institutions. Your support of The Investigative Project on
Terrorism is critical in winning a battle we cannot afford to lose. All
donations are tax-deductible. Click here to donate online. The
Investigative Project on Terrorism Foundation is a recognized 501(c)3
organization.
202-363-8602
- main
202-966-5191
- fax
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment