In this mailing:
- Soeren Kern: The Islamization
of Britain in 2017
- Majid Rafizadeh: The Regime Chants
"Death to America", Iranians Chant "Death to
Mullahs"
- Ruthie Blum: The NGO
Industry's Terror Trail
by Soeren Kern • January 1, 2018
at 5:00 am
- Reports of alleged
links between Islamic charities and terrorism or extremism
surged to a record high, according to the Charity Commission,
a charity watchdog.
- Azad Ali, an
Islamist who has said that he supports killing British
soldiers, was named a director of Muslim Engagement and
Development (Mend), a controversial Muslim pressure group
which advises the British government. Ali said that the
jihadist attack at Westminster on March 22, 2017 was not an
act of terrorism.
- "Politicians
tell us they are unafraid, but they are never the victims. How
easy to be unafraid when one is protected from the line of
fire. The people have no such protections." —
Manchester-born singer Morrissey.
- The British
government refused to say whether telling people about
Christianity could be a hate crime. Lord Pearson of Rannoch
said that when he raised a question on the issue in the House
of Lords, the government failed to state clearly whether
Christians can be prosecuted just for stating their beliefs.
On
February 1 ("world hijab day"), UK Prime Minister Theresa
May said that women should feel free to wear the hijab, a
traditional Islamic headscarf, stating: "What a woman wears is
a woman's choice." Pictured above: Theresa May (then Home
Secretary) wears a headscarf while attending an interfaith event at
Al Madina Mosque in East London, in February 2015. (Image source:
Imams Online video screenshot)
The Muslim population of Britain surpassed 4.1
million in 2017 to become around 6.3% of the overall population of
64 million, according to a recent study on the growth of the Muslim
population in Europe. In real terms, Britain has the third-largest
Muslim population in the European Union, after France, then
Germany.
The rapid growth of Britain's Muslim population can
be attributed to immigration, high birth rates and conversions to
Islam.
Islam and Islam-related issues, omnipresent in
Britain during 2017, can be categorized into several broad themes:
1) Islamic extremism and the security implications of British
jihadists; 2) The continuing spread of Islamic Sharia law in
Britain; 3) The sexual exploitation of British children by Muslim
gangs; 4) Muslim integration into British society; and 5) The
failures of British multiculturalism.
JANUARY 2017
by Majid Rafizadeh • January 1,
2018 at 4:30 am
- Now, people in Iran
are demanding not just limited reforms but regime change. The
government has been doing all it can to stoke the flames of
hatred, but has been trying to deflect it to "Death to
America" and "Death to Israel".
- The Trump
administration is taking the right side by supporting the
Iranian people; they are the principal victims of the Iranian
regime and its Islamist agenda.
- Let us not be on the
side of history that would remain silent in the face of such
crimes against humanity, let us not join the ranks of other
dictators, terrorists, and criminals, that turned a blind eye
to violence, and the will of brave, innocent people.
Pictured:
People in Tehran, Iran, protest against rigged elections during the
popular uprising in the name of the "Green Movement," on
June 16, 2009. (Image source: Milad Avazbeigi/Wikimedia Commons)
Protests have grown and have spread across Iran in
cities such as Tehran, Kermanshah, Shiraz, Rasht, Qom, Hamedan,
Ahvaz, Isfahan, Zahedan, Qazvin, and Sari.
The political nature of the protests has been made
clear from the outset and the regime is experiencing a political
earthquake. The regime's gunmen have been out in full force.
Despite the brutal power being deployed to crush these peaceful
demonstrators -- four protestors have already been reported killed
-- more people are flooding the streets in defiance of the regime.
The scale of these sudden protests is unprecedented
during the last four decades of the Islamic Republic of Iran's
rule.
by Ruthie Blum • January 1, 2018
at 4:00 am
- All a group has to
say to garner the support of many European politicians is that
its mission is to promote human rights. The words have a
"halo effect," a term used in psychology to describe
the tendency to favorably judge people, companies, groups,
products, and so forth, based on the image of morality or some
other positive factor. In the context of NGOs, groups that
claim to promote values seen as universally good -- such as
peace, human rights, justice and coexistence -- are
automatically perceived as credible and above criticism or
investigation.
- After World War II
and the Communist period, the concept of "civil
society" -- later called "NGOs" by the UN --
became holy in Europe. Civil society was supposed to be the
antidote to manipulative democracy, like that of the Weimar
Republic. But they forgot to ask what happens when civil
society is itself the manipulating force. There are no checks
and balances imposed on it.
- The NGO lobby at the
UN plays a crucial role, because it is a
multi-billion-dollar-a-year business. It is an industry, and
it needs to be called just that.
Professor
Gerald Steinberg, founder and president of the Jerusalem-based
research organization NGO Monitor. (Image source: Begin-Sadat
Center for Strategic Studies)
Last week, Professor Gerald Steinberg, founder and
president of the Jerusalem-based research organization NGO Monitor,
had "breaking news": The Danish government had formalized
a decision to stop funding the Human Rights International
Humanitarian Law Secretariat, an NGO framework established in 2013 at
Birzeit University in Ramallah, with an annual budget of millions
of euros, paid for by the governments of Sweden, Holland, Denmark
and Switzerland.
Steinberg's research had revealed that of the 24
core NGOs funded by the Secretariat, six have ties to the
Marxist-Leninist Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
(PFLP) – which is on the EU's official list of terrorist
organizations -- and 15 are involved in worldwide campaigns to
destroy Israel by economic means.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment