Monday, April 27, 2009

Energy security, part two










homelearnactlocal chaptersContact Congress








Dear Solsticewitch13,


Last Thursday we sent you an Action Alert from Lisa Piraneo, our
Director of Government Relations, regarding the Open Fuel Standard Act. We
received a number of emails with good questions about why we chose this
piece of legislation to support. The answer is we did so for both policy
and strategic reasons.

For those of you who have attended one of
our “Citizens in Action” conferences, the information that follows will
probably sound familiar to you. We devote a significant amount of time in
these conferences to thinking and acting strategically in order to
maximize our effectiveness. This is why we created this conference, and
why we strongly encourage every chapter leader and member to attend.
(There’s still time to register for this Saturday’s live webcast. Simply
click here to register for this upcoming webcast or for
another conference of your choice).

Many of the questions we
received related to why we chose this bill rather than working on another
energy-related bill at this time. Here’s why:



  • The bill has support from both Democrats and
    Republicans. In other words, it actually has a chance to become law. No
    matter how good an idea appears, if it has little or no chance to become
    law, spending precious human and financial resources to win its passage
    is not strategically smart. That’s the case with expanded domestic oil
    production – it’s not going to happen right now given the political
    realities in Washington (more on this below).


  • Energy legislation is being considered in the
    Congress right now – which means this is the time to get behind a bill
    like this.


  • The bill is inexpensive. Unlike expensive
    federal subsidies for alternative fuels and the high cost of many
    government mandates, the cost to retro-fit cars to accommodate a variety
    of fuels is very small, only about $100. Unlike many government mandates
    on auto production, this one is unobtrusive and inexpensive.


  • It creates a new energy market. Instead of
    handing out our tax dollars to subsidize alternative fuels, this bill
    will create a new market for those fuels – millions of vehicles that can
    run on fuel made from biodegradable waste such as leaves, weeds and
    grass. When entrepreneurs realize that such a market will exist, the
    incentive will exist for investment in the production of such fuels.
    Currently the incentive to develop such fuels does not exist because the
    market for the fuels does not exist.


  • It sends a signal to oil-producing countries.
    The mere act of moving in this direction will send a signal to countries
    like Saudi Arabia and Venezuela that America is getting serious about
    using alternatives to oil.

Some of you asked if we support more domestic
drilling of oil. We DO support such drilling. The problem is, the Obama
administration and most of the Democratic leaders in Congress do not.
(President Obama actually reversed Bush’s decision to open up offshore
drilling). If gas prices spiked back above $4.00 a gallon, there might be
a sufficient outcry from voters that would pressure President Obama and
these leaders to change their minds. But without a deafening roar
from the grassroots of America, which does not now exist, it is clear to
us that we must look for other energy options to support in the meantime.
Should gas prices spike again, you can count on the fact that we will be
part of the grassroots roar demanding more drilling. However, to put all
our eggs in the basket of domestic oil production is simply not
strategically smart.

There are other options we support, such as
an ambitious build-up of nuclear power and the expanded use of natural gas
to power trucks and buses. Unfortunately, as is the case with increased
domestic oil production, the Obama administration has signaled it is not
really interested in either of these options at this time. We do believe
there is a case to make to cities across America to convert buses and
trucks to natural gas, and we will focus on that yet this year.


The Open Fuel Standard Act is not a silver bullet. It might not
even prove to be the best policy option available.
But it is
achievable
. If, in five years, 2 million cars were running on methanol
instead of gas, that would make a positive difference for our national
security. On the other hand, if we focus on policies that are simply not
attainable at this time, what will we have in five years? The same
situation we have now, where we are far too dependent on oil from
countries that mean us harm – and that’s unacceptable from a national
security perspective. So if you haven’t yet acted on last Thursday’s
legislative action alert, there’s still time (see below). And don’t forget
to
click here to register for one of our “Citizens in Action”
conferences. When you attend you’ll understand why one recent attendee, a
chapter leader, said she was “blown away” by what she learned.










LEGISLATIVE ACTION E-MAIL
ALERT!!!!

Contact Congress Today
About the Open Fuel Standard
Act

by Lisa Piraneo
ACT! for America Director of Government
Relations



Dear Solsticewitch13,


Unfortunately, we in America are addicted to oil. This addiction
is not healthy for our economy or our national security, as we learned
last summer when gas prices spiked to over $4.00 a gallon. Last year
alone, the U.S. imported 4.7 billion barrels of oil and oil products. Of
that amount, 1.3 billion barrels came from the Middle East and Venezuela –
countries who are hostile to our nation and our democratic freedoms.


As members of ACT! for America, we fully understand the gravity of
the situation. We understand that every dollar we spend on oil that we
send to nations that fund Islamist terrorism or extremist Islamist
education increases the threat to our national security.

Last
year, oil provided more than 96% of the fuel for our cars and trucks.
Today, for most Americans, there is simply no alternative to oil for their
transportation needs – even if they want an alternative. H.R. 1476, the
Open Fuel Standard Act, changes that. This bi-partisan, common-sense
proposal would require 50% of new cars sold in the United States by 2012,
and 80% by 2015, to be flex fuel vehicles, capable of burning any
combination of gasoline, ethanol, or methanol.

Alternative fuels
like ethanol and methanol can be produced from an abundance of products
other than corn. Grass, weeds, even biodegradable trash, can all be
converted to fuel. A flex fuel standard will produce the demand for these
fuels, as manufacturers and retailers come to realize that, in just a few
years, there will be millions of cars on the roads in America capable of
running on alternative fuels. This is a classic “if you build it they will
come” scenario.

Powerful people on both ends of the political
spectrum – from President Obama to former House Speaker Newt Gingrich –
have called for implementation of flex fuel technology. Flex fuel vehicles
already exist and they only cost about $100 more than the
same car in a gasoline-only version. It is a simple and inexpensive
modification that should be standard in cars, like seatbelts or airbags.


This important legislative proposal is plain common sense, good
for our economy, and good for our national security as it is a huge step
in the direction of reducing our dependence on oil from nations that wish
us harm. This legislation needs the support of all Members of Congress.
Therefore, WE NEED YOUR HELP! Please read the details of this legislation
below – AND WHAT WE NEED FROM YOU – and contact your Member of Congress
right away!


If each of us does just a little, together
we can accomplish a lot!


THE FOLLOWING 2 ACTIONS ARE
WHAT WE NEED
FROM YOU, OUR ACT! FOR AMERICA GRASSROOTS
ADVOCATE!



  1. Please contact your Representative (in the U.S. House of
    Representatives) TODAY, via letter, e-mail or phone call, and ask
    him/her to sign on to H.R. 1476 as a COSPONSOR. If you learn that your
    Member of Congress is already a cosponsor – BE SURE TO SAY THANK YOU! Click
    here
    for contact information for your Representative.



  2. If your Member of Congress serves on the House Committee
    on Energy and Commerce, please also request that H.R. 1476 be attached
    to the Waxman-Markey American Clean Energy Security Act, a larger energy
    bill that is scheduled to be voted on by the Committee in the immediate
    future. (For list of committee members, see below).

DETAILS OF
LEGISLATION
























Bill number:


H.R. 1476


Bill name:


Open Fuel Standard Act of
2009

Date introduced:


March 12,
2009

Sponsor:


Representative Eliot Engel
(D-17th/NY)

Current Cosponsors:


Representatives: Allyson
Schwartz (D-PA); Bruce Braley (D-IA); Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD); Steve
Israel (D-NY); John Barrow (D-GA); Bob Inglis (R-SC)


Committee of Jurisdiction:


House Committee on Energy
and Commerce

Summary of Proposal:
Requires that auto
manufacturers ensure that not less than 80 percent of automobiles
manufactured or sold in the U.S. (by each manufacturer) operate on
fuel mixtures containing 85 percent ethanol, 85 percent methanol, or biodiesel.



THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP WITH THIS

IMPORTANT LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL.


Members of the
House Committee on Energy and Commerce


Members of the House Energy and
Commerce Committee







Democrats (36)


Henry A. Waxman, 30th-CA (Chair)
John D.
Dingell, 15th-MI
Edward J. Markey, 7th-MA

Rick Boucher – 9th-VA
Frank Pallone, Jr. –
6th-NJ
Bart Gordon, 6th-TN
Bobby L.
Rush, 1st-IL
Anna G. Eshoo, 14th-CA

Bart Stupak, 1st-MI
Eliot Engel,
17th-NY
Gene Green, 29th-TX
Diana
DeGette, 1st-CO
Lois Capps, 23rd-CA

Mike Doyle, 14th-PA
Jane Harman,
36th-CA
Janice D. Schakowsky, 9th-IL

Charles A. Gonzalez, 20th-TX
Jay Inslee,
1st-WA
Tammy Baldwin, 2nd-WI
Mike
Ross, 4th-AR
Anthony Weiner, 9th-NY

Jim Matheson, 2nd-UT
G.K. Butterfield,
1st-NC
Charlie Melancon, 3rd-LA
John
Barrow, 12th-GA
Baron Hill, 9th-IN

Doris O. Matsui, 5th-CA
Donna M. Christensen, VI

Kathy Castor, 11th-FL
John P. Sarbanes,
3rd-MD
Christopher S. Murphy, 5th-CT

Zack Space, 18th-OH
Jerry McNerney,
11th-CA
Betty Sutton, 13th-OH
Bruce L.
Braley, 1st-IA
Peter Welch, At Large-VT
Republicans (23)


Joe Barton, 6th-TX, Rnk. Mem.
Ralph M. Hall,
4th-TX
Fred Upton, 6th-MI
Cliff
Stearns, 6th-FL
Nathan Deal, 9th-GA
Ed
Whitfield, 1st-KY
John Shimkus, 19th-IL

John B. Shadegg, 3rd-AZ
Roy Blunt,
7th-MO
Steve Buyer, 4th-IN
George
Radanovich, 19th-CA
Joseph R. Pitts,
16th-PA
Mary Bono Mack, 45th-CA
Greg
Walden, 2nd-OR
Lee Terry, 2nd-NE

Michael J. Rogers, 8th-MI
Sue Myrick,
9th-NC
John Sullivan, 1st-OK
Tim
Murphy, 18th-PA
Michael C. Burgess,
26th-TX
Marsha Blackburn, 7th-TN
Phil
Gingrey, 11th-GA
Steve Scalise, 1st-LA




-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


ACT for
America

P.O. Box 12765
Pensacola, FL 32591

www.actforamerica.org


ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated
to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots
citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to
informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies
that promote America’s national security and the defense of American
democratic values against the assault of radical Islam.
We are only as strong
as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential
to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more
secure.






HOW CAN I TELL OTHERS ABOUT YOUR ORGANIZATION?
Send a personalized version of this message to your friends.




HOW CAN I SUPPORT YOUR ORGANIZATION?
Click here to give an online donation.

No comments:

Post a Comment