Friday, April 17, 2009

from NY to Israel Sultan Reveals The Stories Behind the News








The Fight against "Extremism"


Posted: 16 Apr 2009 06:58 PM PDT




Who are they? They're all around you. They might be eating dinner in the
same restaurant as you, buying the same brand of ketchup and even
watching the same TV shows you do. But there's a terrible difference. They
are that hideous brand of Enemy of the State known as "The Extremist".

After 8 years of wailing and doomsaying, of dragging out the corpse of
Orwell and parading him around to claim that the Bush Administration's
War on Terror was nothing short of a brutal tyranny that violated the
law and the Constitution-- the Obama Administration is rolling back
the clock eight years and tossing out any pesky civil rights issues in order
to fight the real enemy, "extremists".

Naturally "former veterans" top the list as potential extremists, probably
because like most "extremists" they're highly likely to vote for Republicans.
And by now anyone who lived through 8 years of the Clinton Administration
knows that when the left talks about "extremists", they mean people who
would never vote for them or support their agenda.

The fundamental difference between the Bush Administration and Republicans
in general is that when they talk about "dangerous extremists", they mean
foreign terrorists. When the Obama Administration and left wing Democrats
talk about "dangerous extremists", they usually mean people who think taxes
are too high. If there's a better bellwether of the difference between
national defense and national tyranny.

The Bush Administration viewed people who wanted to massacre Americans
as the major extremist threat. The Obama Administration views people who
question their tax and spend policies as the major extremist threat.

That made the noxious hypocrisy in which Democrats, the press and assorted
liberals spent the last 8 years screaming that we're living in a tyrannical state
with no civil liberties-- all the more foul.

Under the Clinton Administration, we saw the military used against American
citizens in violation of the Posse Comitatus act. We saw talk show hosts in
the political opposition accused of responsibility for terrorist attacks. We
saw a man dragged through the mud and tried in the press for a bombing
he was never responsible for, while the foreign terrorists responsible for
the original bombing of the World Trade Center got a virtual free pass...
leading in to 9/11.

We saw border police armed with machine guns storming the home
of an immigrant's private residence, kidnapping a young boy at gunpoint
and deporting to a brutal totalitarian regime.

We also saw the use of roving wiretaps, secret evidence and a wide variety of
tools given to the Federal government, that Janet Reno and Eric Holder
repeatedly abused. And now those same folks are back in the driver's
seat and working hard on their enemies lists.



And naturally the civil liberties people have nothing to say on the subject.
Because the targets are "extremists", by which we naturally mean people
who don't read the New York Times or listen to NPR or get their news from
DailyKos or Katie Couric.
The same people who found Bush's tactics in the name of national defense to
be tyrannical, are all for Obama's war against his political opposition-- whether
it's organizing smear campaigns out of the White House targeting his remaining
media critics or working to criminalize his grass roots opposition.

As the Obama Administration works to define the War on Terror down from
fighting overseas terrorist groups to fighting generic extremists, who will
naturally turn out to be members of his own political opposition, we can see
how national defense becomes sacrificed to national tyranny in the name of
appeasement and outright treason.

And now suddenly the same brave defenders of the Constitution for the last 8
years, nod along and say that, yes maybe the Constitution needs some
updating. And perhaps it's time for an age limit for Supreme Court justices.
And naturally the government needs to monitor and take action against
"extremist" groups.

After all if thinking for yourself, instead of letting the New York Times think
for you isn't a crime-- maybe it should be.














No comments:

Post a Comment