 | Middle East Forum | |||
| MEF Home Research & Writings Middle East Quarterly | ||||
Obama's | ||||
 Send |  RSS | Share:    |
President Barack Obama and I have one thing in
common shared by few Americans: we were brought up by at least one parent
— biological or step is irrelevant — who was born and raised in an Islamic
milieu. Intimately aware of the inevitable effects of this, I must
question Obama's sincerity in his approach to the Islamic world.
While I was born and raised in the U.S., my
parents were born and raised in Egypt. Even though they were Christians
(Copts), it was only natural that they would adopt an "Islamicate"
worldview, that is, a worldview based on Islamic culture and society,
though obviously not Islamic dogma. As a result, while I share and
appreciate the Western worldview, so too am I intimately acquainted with
the Islamic world's weltanschauung.
This is a worldview typified by cynicism and
stoicism: a belief that humanity is intrinsically opportunistic, selfish,
and warlike; that might not only makes right, but almost should;
that those in the right do not apologize or appease, but rather assert; a
survival-of-the-fittest mentality; and, above all, sheer contempt for
perceived weakness and equivocation, or, in Islamic parlance, emasculate
behavior. Let's call this a worldview based on "primordial politics."
Anyone who has spent time in the Islamic world
or held sincere conversations with people from there — Muslim or Christian
makes no difference — will know this to be true. In short, the worldview
of the average person from the Islamic world is the antithesis of the
postmodern, "therapeutic" worldview of the liberal West, where "feelings,"
"mutual respect," "toleration," and the ability to "express oneself" are
paramount. This is only natural: people bred in harsh environments (e.g.,
the vast majority of the Islamic world) are not impressed by soft or
sublime words.
It bears repeating that these qualities are not
so much due to Islam per se; rather, they have an ancient lineage and have
permeated almost every major civilization, including the West (e.g., the
"neocons"). It is the postmodern, liberal worldview that is aberrant to
human history, that is a dot in a long continuum of realpolitik. Living
and dying in the height of our era — human lives are so short — it is easy
to overlook the evanescence of this epistemology.
Islamic civilization, on the other hand, whose
essence is trapped in the medieval era (thanks primarily to the concept of
sunna),
is by far the staunchest champion of primordial politics.
Here, then, is the problem: If I and countless
other second-generationers are intimately (if not instinctually) aware of
the aforementioned worldview by simply having parents from the Islamic
world, surely Barack Hussein Obama — who, atop that, spent a major chunk
of his youth in the Islamic world (Indonesia), being raised by a Muslim
stepfather — is also aware of the predominance of this worldview. This is
especially the case since almost everyone — friend or foe — makes it a
point to say that Obama is a very "insightful" man, "in tune" with the
rest of the world.
Thus he of all American leaders should know
that the sort of idealistic,
"feel-good" talk of mutual respect (i.e., appeasement), such as he
often gives, while moving to his constituency, will have little effect on
the people of the Islamic world — except, perhaps, to breed more contempt
for the American "paper
tiger," Osama bin Laden's appellation for the U.S. during Clinton's
era. So why does Obama do it? Indeed, why does he do so more than other
Western leaders (whose naivety is somewhat justified in that they do not
have the insights afforded by his background)?
This reminds one of Islamist tactics. Al-Qaeda,
for instance, which is well acquainted with both the Western and Islamic
worldviews, has made it a point to speak a "language" that Westerners
understand (mutual respect, justice, tolerance, etc.) and another that
Muslims understand (jihad, honor, conquest) — both
diametrically opposed. The purpose, of course, is to buy the Islamic
world time to grow stronger and receive concessions, while lulling the
West into thinking that all conflict will end with just a bit more respect
and appeasement for Muslims — concepts alien to the Islamic worldview,
where respect and appeasement are articulated solely through an Islamic
paradigm, i.e., non-Muslims (infidels) get neither.
Obama achieves the same end by doing the
opposite: he speaks to Muslims in a language which only Westerners
appreciate but which the majority of Muslims scoff at. In both cases —
whether the fine platitudes come from Osama or Obama — only Americans are
being deceived into thinking peace is a matter of "winning hearts and
minds."
Prior to the election, many hailed Obama's
Muslim roots, his "otherness," as strategic to endearing the Muslim world
to the U.S. In fact, his unique ability to appreciate the Islamic world's
epistemology — his experiences, not his name — was the real bonus.
Unfortunately, not only is he not making use of this advantage; he is
spearheading the reverse — apologies,
concessions, and soft talk — all which will inevitably promote an even
more assertive Muslim response. Yet he of all American presidents should —
indeed, does — know better.
Raymond Ibrahim is the
associate director of the Middle East Forum and the author of The Al
Qaeda Reader, translations of religious texts and
propaganda.
Originally published at: http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/obamas-puzzling-approach-to-the-muslim-world/
Related
Topics: US
policy Raymond
Ibrahim
To subscribe to the MEF mailing lists, go to http://www.meforum.org/list_subscribe.php
You may post or forward this text, but on condition that you send it as an
integral whole, along with complete information about its author, date,
publication, and original URL.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment