|
Follow the Middle East Forum
|
|
Please take a moment to
visit and log in at the subscriber
area, and submit your city & country location. We will use this
information in future to invite you to any events that we organize in your
area.
Erdoğan Is in
Trouble
Be the first of your
friends to like this.
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, the charismatic leader of the Islamist Justice and
Development Party (AKP) and Prime Minister of Turkey, is embroiled in a
significant graft scandal that might precipitate the end of his rule.
Erdoğan has won three consecutive national elections since 2002, serving
as Turkey's Prime Minister since 2003. He was catapulted to power largely
because of widespread disgust with the corruption of the old Kemalist
elites. It is therefore ironic that graft may bring Erdoğan down.
AKP ascendance to a pivotal role in Turkey's political system came about
as a result of several factors: rejection of discredited politicians and their
blatant Kemalist secularism, an economic crisis, demographic trends
bringing to the fore traditional elements in Turkish society, and the
ascendance of an attractive political leader in Erdoğan.
Erdoğan's governments stabilized the economy and, for a while,
demonstrated a cautious approach with regard to enhancing the role of Islam
in the public sphere. This was accompanied by continuity in Turkish foreign
policy: attempts to join the EU, membership in the Western alliance, and
good relations with Israel.
But under Erdoğan, Turkey gradually adopted policies that amounted to a
wholesale attempt to Islamize the country: putting restrictions on the sale
of alcohol, enhancing the status of religious schools, encouraging the
establishment of Muslim-oriented institutions of learning, and nominating
Islamists to sensitive positions in the public sector.
Many Turks started complaining about growing authoritarianism at home.
This was particularly felt in the Turkish media that was subject to
intimidation and takeover attempts. Journalists were sent to jail under a
variety of charges. The business community felt informal pressure to
conform to Muslim mores. More recently, the banking system was similarly
subject to infiltration by government-sponsored Islamists.
Changes were also introduced in the foreign policy area. Fueled by
Islamist and Ottoman impulses, Turkey devised a so-called "Zero
Problems Policy" toward its Middle Eastern neighbors. Instead of the
Kemalist hands-off policy toward the Middle East, the new approach
emphasized good relations with Muslim neighbors in order to attain a
leading role for Turkey in the Muslim world.
As part of this attempt to gain hegemony in the Arab and Muslim worlds,
Israel-bashing became an important tool of Erdoğan's foreign policy,
causing deterioration in relations between Ankara and Jerusalem. This
policy also reflected a Turkish distancing from the West, basically giving
up the long-cherished Turkish goal of becoming part of Europe. (The
Europeans are partly at fault for that). The apex of this foreign
re-orientation was the September 2013 decision to purchase an air defense
weapons system from China, which is clearly and blatantly at odds with
Turkey's NATO membership.
The Zero Problems policy backfired as its neighbors went into turmoil
and Turkish hegemonic overtures were rebuffed. The political and economic
crisis called the "Arab Spring" provided an opportunity for
Turkey to sell itself as a model, as a successful bridge between Islam and
modernity. But the Islamist zeal emanating from Ankara could not transcend
the historic ethnic enmity between Turks and Arabs.
Foreign policy failures paralleled growing domestic discontent. The
events around Gezi Park in Istanbul this past summer were a spark that
galvanized popular opposition. Erdoğan seemed to have lost his touch and
reacted aggressively to the demonstrators. Eliciting criticism even from
allies, Erdoğan had to shelve the plan to hold a referendum to make the
presidency a stronger political institution for which he could run in the
future.
Most important, a rift developed between the AKP and the Fetullah Gülen
movement. The Gülens are seemingly modern Islamists and an important
component of the AKP. They have become increasingly uncomfortable with
Erdoğan's policies. For example, they were not happy with Turkey's new
foreign policy, with Israeli-Turkish tensions, and with Turkish support for
the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. They also criticized Erdoğan's clumsy
treatment of the Gezi Park affair.
In November, the prime minister announced that he would close down the
country's private exam prep schools, or dershanes, roughly a quarter
of which are run by Gülen's followers. This further estranged the
Gülenists, weakening Erdoğan's domestic support. Gülen's media outlet, Zaman,
the largest newspaper in Turkey, has become openly critical of Erdoğan.
The police and the judiciary, largely under the influence of Gülen, were
responsible for the recent arrests of several Erdoğan's protégés under
charges of corruption. The prime minister executed a major reshuffling of
his cabinet in an attempt to distance itself from the corruption scandal.
Erdoğan's leadership is contested these days as never before. It is not
clear yet how he and his party, the AKP, will come out of the current political
crisis. The secularists in Turkey now have a chance to further erode
Erdoğan's popularity. Their own standing in Turkish politics has not
improved much despite Erdoğan's excesses. However, the more conservative
secular elements on the Turkish political spectrum might build an alliance
with the influential Gülens to remove Erdoğan.
Municipal elections scheduled for March 2014 will be the first serious
test of the extent of the political damage to Erdoğan, followed by
presidential elections in June. Erdoğan's authoritarian streak and strains
on the economy will be issues in the campaign. It remains to be seen
whether Erdoğan's attempt to blame his domestic problems on foreigners is
successful.
The results of the municipal and presidential elections will not just be
a popularity contest for Erdoğan, but a struggle for Turkey's soul.
Prof. Efraim Inbar, director of the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic
Studies, is a professor of political studies at Bar-Ilan University and a
fellow at the Middle East Forum.
Related
Topics: Turkey and Turks
| Efraim Inbar This
text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral
whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author,
date, place of publication, and original URL.
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment