Friday, March 18, 2016

Eye on Iran: Defense Secretary Calls Iranian Seizure of American Sailors






Join UANI  
  FacebookFollow Us on Twitter View our videos on YouTube
   
 
Top Stories

NYT: "Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter said on Thursday that Iran may have violated international law when it seized 10 American sailors in the Persian Gulf in January. 'Iran's actions were outrageous, unprofessional and inconsistent with international law,' Mr. Carter said in a testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee. The sailors were detained after veering off course into Iranian territorial waters near Farsi Island, the home of an Iranian Navy base, and were freed after about 14 hours. Video footage released by the Iranian government showed the sailors kneeling at gunpoint with their hands clasped behind their heads. At the time, the Obama administration emphasized the sailors' quick release, calling it a result of the diplomatic channels opened by the nuclear deal struck last year with Iran. Secretary of State John Kerry, who built a close relationship during the nuclear talks with his Iranian counterpart, Mohammad Javad Zarif, thanked Iran for its cooperation... Mr. Carter initially showed restraint in his remarks about the episode, but two weeks after the detention, he said he was 'very, very angry' about the sailors' treatment. On Thursday, Mr. McCain, the chairman of the Armed Services Committee, pressed Mr. Carter about the administration's response. 'You've made it quite clear that you're outraged and all that,' Mr. McCain said. 'But what specifically have you recommended to do in response to that?' ... According to a Navy spokesman, a report on the episode was given to Vice Adm. Kevin Donegan, the commander of the Navy's Fifth Fleet, on Feb. 28. The spokesman said that after the review process was complete, a redacted version would be released to the public." http://t.uani.com/1XA9hdT

Politico: "Iran may be open for business following the historic nuclear accord with the West, but for European companies the road to Tehran still leads through Washington. And this has European leaders grumbling that the U.S. Treasury Department is blocking the way for European firms to renew trading ties with Iran. The hype about the easing of sanctions on Iran covered up a more nuanced reality. In January, the Obama administration lifted measures focused on the country's nuclear program, but left in place restrictions designed to punish Iran for its support of Lebanon's Hezbollah, including most of a wide-ranging embargo on American business with Tehran that's been in place since 1995. The EU lifted most of the economic and financial curbs that it had first imposed on Tehran in 2008 - sanctions that had slashed EU-Iran trade dramatically. Two months on, European companies say they are hamstrung by the remaining U.S restrictions. Most notable is a far-reaching 2011 regulation that prohibits banks from processing any Iran-related transactions in the United States, which affects any bank dealing in U.S. dollars. After a decade where several big European banks got burned by billion-dollar fines for sanctions violations in Washington and New York, European financial institutions say they're not touching Iran. That in turn limits the financing options for European companies looking to trade with Iran. Markus Kerber, the director-general of the Federation of German Industries, Germany's largest business association, said in an interview that 'the banks, at the moment, are not going anywhere near Iran. A sensible bank manager will not even look the country up on the map.' ... While Iranian leaders are announcing multi-billion-dollar deals with the likes of Airbus and Peugeot, some officials remain skeptical of whether some of the billion-dollar announcements that Iran has made in recent weeks will actually come to fruition. 'Which banks [are being used]? I don't know how [commercial deals with Iran] will work, because of the over-compliance of the banks,' said the senior European official, adding that New York prosecutors are also a threat. 'I doubt all these figures, which have been waved by the Iranians in front of the Americans like a red flag.' ... There's another worrisome message coming out of Treasury, says the European official: 'Beyond the doctrine of the administration, we can't be assured that the District Attorney of New York will have the same interpretation of the U.S.sanctions.' ... Over the last decade, New York prosecutors have been key players in a string of high-profile Iran-related sanctions settlements in the financial sector. Many of the banks were not based in the United States, but they did their business in U.S. dollars, with branches in Manhattan, and as a result fell under the purview of not just the Justice Department but also New York authorities... Diplomats and business officials like Kerber don't expect many major Iran deals to truly be finalized until after the U.S. presidential election. 'Every sensible businessman in Germany or in Europe knows ... that you will not rush into the Iranian market without looking westward,' he said." http://t.uani.com/1Meb9Zk

Asharq Al-Awsat: "Evidence against Iran and Hezbollah keep on accumulating on both being firsthand involved in the 9/11 terrorist attacks that reportedly killed thousands of U.S. citizens. Asharq Al-Awsat has exclusively attained and published six documents New York courthouse Judge George Daniels used for the verdict which fines Iran with billions of dollars in compensation for the families of the victims of the attack. The verdict also specialized a cut for compensating the insurance companies that bore fiscal losses due to the 9/11 attacks. George Daniels condemned Iran for facilitating the execution of the terrorist attacks that affected both New York and Washington. Documents procured by Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper emphasize Iran smoothing out the route for al-Qaeda terrorists moving to campgrounds in Afghanistan for training, which proved necessary for the 9/11 attacks to hit target. Moreover, documents exposed that Hezbollah alleged minister of defense Imad Mughniyeh- assassinated in 2008- had visited the perpetrators in October 2000 and had arranged their flight to Iran with new passports for their assurance before dispatching them for the attack. Iranian administration had also given orders for border checkpoints and observatories to stamp the passports of the terrorist attackers, in a move to facilitate their advance. Al-Qaeda persistently had a supporting lifeline provided by the Iranian government, which also provided the terrorist organization- according to the documents- with both financial backing and safe haven to terrorist top leaders after the September 11 attacks... The trial revealed that each of Osama bin Laden , Ayman al-Zawahiri-current leader of al-Qaeda- ,Mughniyeh and other Iranian attaches met in Khartoum, Sudan to establish an alliance supporting terrorism. A courthouse judiciary source, requesting anonymity, revealed that six people and bodies are accused in the case filed against Iran. The six comprise, Supreme Leader of Iran Ali Khamenei, former Iranian intelligence minister Ali Fallahian, deputy commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and Brig. Gen. Mohammed Baqir tho al-Qader. Administrational bodies among the accused are the Iranian Ministry of Intelligence, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and its special operations division, the Quds Force." http://t.uani.com/1XA7PZ5

Nuclear & Ballistic Missile Program

Reuters: "Iran will likely escape new United Nations sanctions, though the U.N. Security Council could issue a public reprimand for recent launches of what Western officials described as ballistic missiles capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, diplomats said. Council diplomats said the case for sanctions was weak, hinging on interpretation of ambiguous language in a resolution adopted by the 15-member body last July, part of an historic deal to curb Iran's nuclear work... the Security Council resolution 'calls upon' Iran to refrain for up to eight years from activity, including launches, related to ballistic missiles designed with the capability of delivering nuclear weapons... Britain said the missile launches show Iran's 'blatant disregard' for the resolution, while France said it was 'a case of non-compliance.' The United States initially deemed the tests a violation, but has softened that stance, calling Iran 'in defiance' of the resolution. Russia, which has Security Council veto power, says Iran has not violated the resolution. Russia opposes new U.N. sanctions, but acknowledged that if the missiles were proven capable of carrying a nuclear weapon, it could be suggested Tehran has not been 'respectful' of the council. 'A call is different from a ban, so legally you cannot violate a call, you can comply with a call or you can ignore the call, but you cannot violate a call,' Russian U.N. Ambassador Vitaly Churkin said on Monday. 'The legal distinction is there.' Laura Rockwood, former chief of the legal department at the International Atomic Energy Agency and now head of the Vienna Center for Disarmament and Nonproliferation, said of the U.N. resolution: 'This was probably a classic case of language negotiated with constructive ambiguity in mind.'" http://t.uani.com/1RTaVmX

U.S.-Iran Relations

Free Beacon: "The Obama administration is being accused of stalling a congressional investigation into a purported $1.7 billion taxpayer-funded 'ransom payment' to Iran in exchange for the release of several U.S. prisoners, according to documents and information provided to the Washington Free Beacon by sources familiar with the matter. The administration initially came under fire from congressional critics in January, when it was announced that the United States had settled a longstanding legal dispute with Iran over the breakdown in a decades-old arms sale. Under the terms of the settlement, Iran was to be paid a $400 million balance and an additional $1.3 billion in interest from a taxpayer fund maintained by the Treasury Department, a State Department official confirmed to the Free Beacon in January... The $1.7 billion payment was announced just prior to the release of five U.S. prisoners who had been held in Iran, leading to accusations that the deal is tantamount to a ransom payment. Iranian officials, at the time, independently described the transaction as a form of ransom." http://t.uani.com/1RTasB3

Congressional Action

AP: "A group of Republican senators on Thursday unveiled legislation that requires the Obama administration to impose stricter sanctions on every sector of Iran's economy that supports the country's ballistic missile program. The bill, introduced by Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., is a reflection of longstanding exasperation among GOP lawmakers who've complained that President Barack Obama has failed to properly punish Tehran for repeatedly defying a U.N. ballistic missile test ban. Ayotte and other Republicans said senior U.S. military officials are in favor of tougher sanctions. Both Defense Secretary Ash Carter and Army Gen. Joseph Votel, Obama's choice to be the next U.S. commander for the Middle East, have told the Senate Armed Services Committee in the last week that harder hitting sanctions are necessary. Iran's Revolutionary Guard test-fired two ballistic missiles on March 9 and U.S. officials said the launches were in defiance of the U.N. resolution, which calls for Tehran not to launch any ballistic missiles capable of delivering a nuclear weapon... The administration in January announced sanctions against Tehran for missile firings in late 2015, but Republicans called those measures tepid and weak. Ayotte's legislation is supported by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, which suggests the bill could be taken up quickly. Republicans remain frustrated after they were unable to scuttle the international accord to check Iran's nuclear program in exchange for economic sanctions relief. 'Tough words alone will not deter the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism from continuing to develop its ballistic missile program,' Ayotte said. The legislation requires new sanctions against persons who knowingly aid Iran's missile program and against entities controlled or owned in part by Iran's primary ballistic missile organizations. The bill also would mandate a broad reach by requiring the president to issue sanctions on entire sectors of Iran's economy found to be directly or indirectly supporting Iran's missile program. Republican senators Marco Rubio of Florida, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Mark Kirk of Illinois also are backing the bill." http://t.uani.com/22rF6Jj

Business Risk

NYT: "When the United States government punished ZTE of China this month, saying it had done business with Iran, it released internal company documents that it said detailed how the electronic equipment maker had done it - and that also suggested the problem might not be limited to one Chinese company. One document described how ZTE would set up seemingly independent companies - called 'cut-off companies' - that would sign the deals in other countries. That could enable it to continue to do business in Iran, North Korea and other countries placed under American restrictions. In describing the effort, the document cited as a model - and at times a cautionary tale - a rival company it called F7. ZTE said F7 had done something similar, though its business in restricted companies ended up hurting its American ambitions. The document does not give F7's real name. But the description offered by ZTE matches a company far larger and more politically sensitive: Huawei Technologies, its chief rival and a major force in the technology world. The ZTE document, dated August 2011, suggests that other Chinese companies could have potential exposure to American export limits. Given the recent sanctions against ZTE, it also suggests that the issue could be a continuing one between Chinese and American government officials." http://t.uani.com/1Me3ha0

Sanctions Relief

Press TV (Iran): "The media in Seoul have reported that Korea Gas Corporation (KOGAS) is considering a project to build a subsea pipeline to take natural gas from Iran to Oman - what would bring Tehran closer to an ambitious plan to become an exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG). Pulse news portal reported that related talks are currently underway between officials from Iran and South Korea. Project owners and KOGAS could sign either a memorandum of understanding or a framework agreement in April or May, the report added. The 400-kilometer pipeline, stretching from Iran to Oman is defined in two onshore and offshore sections... According to Pulse, the construction of the subsea pipeline is estimated to cost $1.5 billion." http://t.uani.com/1RoTzUH

Mehr (Iran): "Iranian banks have opened more than 480 million euros of credit through Iran-Europe Commercial Bank (IECB). An amount of 108 million euros of the total €480 million belongs to Bank of Industry and Mine while the rest are owned by other banks in the country including Mellat and Tejarat banks. The Central Bank of Iran (CBI) has announced that the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) is up and running and there exist no barriers to opening LCs via SWIFT. Registered in Hamburg, Germany, the Iran-Europe Commercial Bank (IECB) owns 40 years of experience playing an active role in Iran's international financial transactions." http://t.uani.com/1MefGLl

Reuters: "Iran Air could be a buyer of some A340 planes that Lufthansa no longer needs, the chief executive of the German airline said on Thursday. Lufthansa has signed a memorandum of understanding with Iran Air that comprises cooperation on maintenance and catering, as the country emerges from a period of sanctions... 'We are looking at whether Iran Air is perhaps a customer to take those planes from Lufthansa,' Carsten Spohr said after Lufthansa reported annual results on Thursday." http://t.uani.com/258MU57

Just-Auto: "GAZ Group says it is in negotiation with Iran to construct a manufacturing plant as the ending of sanctions opens up the hitherto largely closed country. The Russian maker of Gazelle light trucks is eyeing Iran after decades of Western-led economic sanctions led to an aging vehicle parc, which is in serious need of modernisation. 'Yes, absolutely [we are] in negotiations [although] it is not easy,' GAZ Group CEO, Vadim Sorokin told just-auto on the sidelines of today's (15 March) Russian Automotive Forum in Moscow. 'We would manufacture GAZ buses - it is lucrative for the future. 'They [Iran] have announced a tender for 17,000 city buses, it is official. They build their own commercial vehicles, but they are not the latest state-of-the-art. We seem some potential for ourselves." http://t.uani.com/1S88LlV

Tasnim (Iran): "A senior official with Russia's biggest carmaker Avtovaz said Iran could be a promising export market for the company in 2016 following the termination of anti-Tehran sanctions. 'Around 50,000 (cars are planned) to be exported. Of course, it will depend on many factors but we realize that amid current environment, amid falling domestic market we should focus on export,' Mikhail Ryabov said Tuesday as cited by the Tass news agency." http://t.uani.com/1XAbJ4i

Regional Destabilization

Reuters: "Kuwait is not a 'free-rider' in U.S.-led campaigns against terrorism and other threats, a senior Kuwaiti security official said on Thursday, rejecting comments by President Barack Obama critical of some U.S. allies. Sheikh Thamer al-Sabah, President of Kuwait's National Security Bureau, was referring to Obama's remarks to The Atlantic magazine last week in which he said some states in the Gulf and Europe were 'free-riders' who called for U.S. action without getting involved themselves... He said Tehran's nuclear deal with world powers had not diminished Kuwait's concerns over Iran. These included militant sleeper cells and spies, involvement in regional conflicts and the safety of the Bushehr nuclear power plant. Kuwait is the closest major population center to it. 'The security issue from Iran was always there and I think will always continue. It is not something new,' he said. 'I salute you for trying your best to work with Iran only on their nuclear program despite knowing what Iran is doing for Hezbollah in Lebanon, for other places in the world, for bombings, for hijacking of aircraft, for assassinations of people,' he added. 'I salute them on how they can actually sit down and talk about only the nuclear program with the knowledge they have of how Iran is capable of doing all of these things. I can't do it.' He voiced concern about Iraq, where Iranian-backed Shi'ite militias are fighting alongside government forces against Islamic State." http://t.uani.com/258GaEd

Human Rights

RSF: "Reporters Without Borders (RSF) reiterates its concern about the conditions in which journalists are being detained in Iran, especially Afarine Chitsaz of the daily newspaper Iran, a young woman arrested at the same time as three other journalists on 2 November. She was able to make a short phone call after her arrest but the authorities have provided no official information about her detention. According to the information obtained by RSF, she is now being held in isolation in Section 2A of Tehran's Evin prison. The Revolutionary Guards control this section and subject detainees to a great deal of pressure, often with the aim of extracting confessions to be used at their trials. Iran is the world's biggest prison for women journalists, with four others currently held. The other four - Rihaneh Tabatabai, Roya Saberi Negad Nobakht, Narges Mohammadi and Atena Ferghdani - are serving jail terms ranging from one to twelve years and some some are in poor health." http://t.uani.com/22oKP60

IranWire: "Over the past two days, several fashion boutiques, hairdressers for women, and film and photography studios in Iran have found their Instagram pages blocked or 'overlaid.' Among them are pages belonging to several Iranian fashion models who were arrested in late January. A large blue frame declaring their images 'blocked' appears in big red letters. Messages displayed on the pages announce that 'Operation Spider 2' is underway. Next to each frame appears the 'justification' for blocking the image, and it is the same for all of them: Article 472 of the Islamic Penal Code prohibits producing and publishing 'obscene images,' and articles 639 and 743 prohibit inciting others to commit 'immoral acts,' and using cyberspace for this purpose. At the top of each frame, viewers are informed authorities have taken the action under the auspices of 'Operation Spider 2.' Under the frame, a further message declares that judiciary officials have ordered the pages blocked, and that they have opened 'security cases' to deal with the people behind them. In February, when news first broke about the arrest of seven Iranian fashion models- Melikaa Zamani, Niloofar Behboudi, Donya Moghadam, Dana Nik, Shabnam Molavi, Elnaz Golrokh and Hamid Fadaei-a website affiliated with the Revolutionary Guards confirmed the news in a short report entitled, 'Earthquake in Instagram.'" http://t.uani.com/1R47Tyx

Opinion & Analysis

Valerie Lincy & Simon Chin in Iran Watch: "This week, the United Nations published some guidance about a critical part of the nuclear agreement with Iran: the procurement channel.  Sales to Iran of items controlled by the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) and of non-listed items with nuclear applications must pass through this channel, following a review by the newly created Procurement Working Group.  The role of this group was set forth in the nuclear agreement, but little information had been released about how it will function in practice. The recent guidance - in the form of two short PowerPoint presentations - comes about two months after the agreement was officially implemented, with Iran scaling back parts of its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.  Because the deal was implemented faster than initially anticipated by Western diplomats, restrictions on Iran's nuclear program have been loosened without the structure necessary to ensure that Iran, as well as any government or company that wants to engage in business with Iran, is complying with the remaining - and considerable - constraints... The procurement channel is just one example of how former restrictions on Iran's nuclear program were removed faster than new enforcement structures could be put in place.  It is unclear how long it will take for the United Nations, the new Joint Commission, and individual states to get the channel up and running-and whether sufficient information will be publicly released about the channel's operations and decisions.  The implementation of the nuclear deal in January was hailed as a diplomatic milestone.  But the agreement's success in reining in Iran's nuclear ambitions cannot be known until it has been in place for some time and its enforcement mechanisms have been tested." http://t.uani.com/1WvNWlF

Khalaf Ahmad al-Habtoor in Al Arabiya: "Iran's proxy in Lebanon Hezbollah works hard to promote itself as the Lebanese resistance against Israeli encroachment and as a political organization representing all Lebanese citizens. In reality, it is anything but. It began life as an Iranian arm on the Mediterranean operating under the pretence of standing against Israel to justify its terrorist activities against Arab and Western interests. Hezbollah's concern for Palestinian interests is nothing but a front to attract recruits. The conflict it unwittingly unleashed with Israel in 2006 with its kidnapping and killing of Israeli soldiers caught its Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah by surprise. He was later to admit the if he had known the abductions would result in a full-scale conflict, he would not have given the orders. Hezbollah's terror operations, hostage-taking and assassinations going back as far as the 1980s are well known, but the fact that a US District Judge has ruled that Hezbollah colluded with the perpetrators of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the twin towers and the Pentagon is not deemed worthy of front page news in the United States or Europe. The story has been picked-up by Asharq Al-Awsat and the Jerusalem Post but has almost been ignored by the Western media whose governments are actively pursuing lucrative deals with Tehran now that its coffers overflow with more than $100 billion following the lifting of sanctions. Given the emotional trauma experienced by the American people on that fateful day which still haunts many, especially the victims' loved ones, the relative silence of the Western media on the case is peculiar - and that is an understatement. Even stranger is that the US has erased both Iran and Hezbollah from its terror threat list in spite of overwhelmingly evidence to the contrary. If the American people were polled as to their knowledge of this, I predict there would be very few who have any inkling at all. Moreover, President Barack Obama has displayed his displeasure at measures taken by Saudi Arabia and other GCC states to brand Hezbollah terrorist, to halt aid to the Hezbollah infiltrated Lebanese Army and to issue travel advisories warning citizens not to visit Lebanon. On 15 December 2011, Judge George Daniels ruled that Iran and Hezbollah materially and directly colluded with al-Qaeda to attack America on its own soil and, thus, they are responsible to pay compensation to the families of victims. He did not pick his findings out of thin air. His judgment against Iran's supreme leader, its former president Ali Rafsanjani, Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps and Hezbollah was supported by 53 pages of evidence as well as testimony given by three Iranian defectors, three members of the 9/11 Commission, CIA operatives and investigative journalists." http://t.uani.com/1RqNv7M
       

Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com

United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons.  UANI is an issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of nuclear weapons.

No comments:

Post a Comment