|
Steven Emerson,
Executive Director
|
December 14, 2017
|
|
NYPD:
Fighting Terrorism on Three Sides
by Patrick Dunleavy
IPT News
December 14, 2017
|
|
|
Share:
|
Be the
first of your friends to like this.
As if the New York
Police Department's task in keeping the city safe from ISIS-inspired
terrorists wasn't arduous enough, it now is faced with other adversarial
forces that often hinder effective counter terrorism measures.
In recent weeks two terror attacks targeted the city that were committed
by self-acknowledged soldiers of ISIS, the radical Islamic group which
recently saw the decimation of its caliphate in Iraq and Syria. The first
attack occurred when Sayfullo Saipov, an Uzbek national, drove a rented
truck into a crowd of pedestrians near Ground Zero on Halloween. Eight
people were killed, another 12 wounded, making it the deadliest attack on the city since 9/11. The second
terrorist attack came at the height of the rush hour Monday morning, when
Bangladeshi immigrant Akayed Ullah detonated a pipe bomb strapped to his
chest in a crowded subway tunnel underneath the Port Authority.
The response by the NYPD, the FDNY, and the Port Authority Police was
nothing short of outstanding. They quickly took control of both areas under
attack and apprehended the terrorists. Saipov was shot by an NYPD officer
as he yelled "Allah Akbar," brandishing what appeared to be two
firearms. And Ullah, instead of waking up to 72 virgins, found himself
handcuffed by Port Authority police officers after his bomb malfunctioned
and he lay on the ground with burns and injuries to his torso.
Immediately following the truck rampage by Saipov, who admitted to
police that he was a member of ISIS, New York Mayor Bill de Blasio agreed
with the statement Deputy Commissioner of Intelligence and Counterterrorism
John Miller made to the press that this attack "isn't about
Islam" or about "what mosque he attends." This is the same
mayor who gutted a major part of the city's counter terrorism surveillance
initiative created by the NYPD's Intelligence Division in 2006, and its
report titled, "Radicalization in the West: The Homegrown Threat."
The report was an eye opening tutorial on how and where Islamic
radicalization takes place. The mayor called that program "broken."
If that were not enough, the New York City Council is considering a bill that would force the police
department to disclose in public reports the specific tactics and resources
it uses when investigating terrorism. The bill would also limit when the
police could enter a suspect's residence or stop and question a person.
Political correctness handicaps the police, as they are frequently
forced to battle against the syndrome caused by politicians who should know
better. Americans by and large are not happy when PC replaces common sense,
particularly when it comes to preventing terrorist attacks. The New York
Post editorial board went so far as to say that the people would no longer tolerate such
hindrances on law enforcement: "New Yorkers don't want a police
department that merely arrives at the scene of a tragedy to pick up the
pieces. They want attacks like Monday's prevented."
The third front challenging law enforcement agencies like the NYPD when
fighting terrorism is the negative attacks from activist groups like the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR).
Immediately following Monday's explosion, NYPD detectives and members of
the Joint Terrorism Task Force rushed to several apartments in Brooklyn
where the suspected bomb maker Akayed Ullah lived. As a normal police
procedure, they evacuated the building and began a search, not only for
evidence, but also for the possibility of additional improvised explosive
devices (IEDs) that Ullah may have constructed.
That evening, while
the investigation was still ongoing, CAIR-NY legal director Albert Fox Cahn
issued a statement on behalf of the Ullah family
complaining about the police department's action. I guess CAIR thought the
police should have left young children in the building where a bomb may
have been. This is the same organization that accused the NYPD of spying on Muslims. This is not its
first go round (battle) with those who are charged with protecting the
United States from terrorists. In fact, in recent years CAIR officials have
actually encouraged members of the Muslim community to refuse to cooperate
with law enforcement agencies investigating terrorism. They portrayed cops in sinister garb sneaking through the
neighborhood as villains not to be trusted.
Facing the terrorist threat head-on in New York City is not something
that the NYPD shrinks back from. On the contrary, the men and women whose
remarkable service has kept us safe welcome the fight. But it sure would be
a lot easier if they didn't have to constantly look over their shoulders to
defend against attacks by politically correct politicians and the activist
groups who never get the facts straight.
IPT Senior Fellow Patrick Dunleavy is the former Deputy Inspector
General for New York State Department of Corrections and author of The Fertile Soil of Jihad. He currently
teaches a class on terrorism for the United States Military Special
Operations School
Related Topics: Homegrown
Terror | Patrick
Dunleavy, New
York Police Department, counter
terrorism, Radicalization
in the West: The Homegrown Threat, Sayfullo
Saipov, Akayed
Ullah, Bill
de Blasio, John
Miller, CAIR,
Albert
Fox Cahn, Homegrown
Terror
|
The IPT accepts no funding from
outside the United States, or from any governmental agency or political or
religious institutions. Your support of The Investigative Project on
Terrorism is critical in winning a battle we cannot afford to lose. All
donations are tax-deductible. Click here to donate online. The
Investigative Project on Terrorism Foundation is a recognized 501(c)3
organization.
202-363-8602
- main
202-966-5191
- fax
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment