Monday, March 9, 2009

from NY to Israel Sultan Reveals The Stories Behind the News







How Islamic Immigration Reverses Civil Rights in the West


Posted: 08 Mar 2009 07:09 PM PDT


Somewhere around the middle of the 19th century, General Napier was

approached by a delegation that protested the British ban on Suttee.

Napier responded by saying,

"It is your custom to burn widows. Very well.


We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope
around their necks and hang them. Build your
funeral pyre and beside it my
carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow
your national custom -
then we shall follow ours."

That was India then. Today Britain not only does not follow its national
custom

abroad, of hanging men who murder women, but does not even follow its own

national customs at home.


The "New Britain" is a Chimera, a creature covered with grafted on

parts and shiny logos, beneath which stirs a great deal of ugliness.

Europe's large immigrant population has brought along its own

customs and beliefs, at a time when Europe's native population no

longer has any faith or confidence in its own "national customs".

When even the idea of a national identity is controversial.

Nor is the problem limited to Europe alone. A combination of

post-modern liberal moral equivalence and Dhimmi cowardice

has rendered Western societies incapable of addressing all the

ugliness that stirs beneath.

The same political establishment which in the name of social

reform and open mindedness has degraded every possible national

tradition across Europe, in America, Australia and in first world

nations around the world-- has treated the brutal customs imported

by Muslim immigrants as sacrosanct. The moral hypocrisy bred by

this double standard has in turn begun wrecking the reforms that the

West has achieved, paradoxically disempowering the very vulnerable

populations on whose behalf liberals once fought.

Women who in many cases went from having few rights, including

the right to travel without a male guardian, take out loans, be

protected against domestic abuse at home and rape outside the

home, are seeing those rights reversed by the tidal flood of immigration

and the refusal by political authorities and social critics to admit what

is going on.

Honor killings are the endgame in repression, but there are quite many

stages in between. Muslim immigrants who import tribal practices that

mandate female inferiority do their best to impose them, first on

their own women, and then finally on their new country as a whole.

The epidemic of gang rapes by Muslim immigrants in Sweden, Australia

and elsewhere in the West are a cultural and religious problem that goes

unacknowledged. They are the outgrowth of a belief system that

views first non-Muslims and especially non-Muslim women as inferior

and open to the taking. But they could not continue without a political

and academic climate that discourages any criticism of Islam, and

presumes that Western beliefs are inherently bad and non-Western

beliefs are inherently good.

There could hardly be a better sanction for the whole ugly parade of

atrocities carried out by Muslims in the West, than the belief imposed

on their own victims that it is they who are at fault for centuries of

colonialism, as if the descendants of Middle Eastern conquerors are

somehow nobler than the descendants of European conquerors.

Rather than confronting the double standard and its high cost, Western

politicians and aademics instead insist on trying to equate Islamic

cultural and religious standards with their own standards.

And so there is a cottage industry for generating articles, books and

slogans insisting that Islam is just as committed to equality and

respect for women and minorities, as the West... if not more so.

The wages of this obscene charade, on a par with Theresienstadt,

a show concentration camp maintained by the Nazis to show how

well they were treating the Jews, is to cover up the real atrocities

and the real erosion of civil rights for minorities in the West.

The Anti-Jewish riots, like the Tournade gang rapes in France, the

terrorist bombings, the intimidation of cartoonists, the persecution of

disabled people by Muslim cabbies, and so much else is part and parcel

of the same problem-- Muslim intolerance for others, and their

insistence that their hateful and bigoted beliefs should be considered

supreme.


With growing concessions toward Islamic law, those beliefs are
moving ever closer to becoming the law of the land in Western
nations. But in many neighborhoods and areas, they are already
the law. When women in France are intimidated into covering
their heads, when an Israeli flag cannot hang in a Berlin window,
when a Danish cartoonist cannot draw a cartoon, when British police
wink at honor killings, when Americans can't catch a cab while carrying
alcohol-- the law of Islam reigns supreme. And in doing so it robs
hundreds of millions of people of their civil rights.

The suicide bombings, the honor killings, the acid throwing and other
atrocities are only the tip of the iceberg. The iceberg itself is the
culture of fear, violence and shame created by Muslims in the West that
intimidates both Muslims and non-Muslims into obeying Sharia law,
rather
than the law of the land.

The hardfought legacy of human freedom is being sacrificed on
the altar of Muslim immigration, and the constant pandering to Muslim
sensibilities over public civil rights. We have come a long way from Napier,
as Muslim women in Britain well know. Not only does England not enforce
national customs abroad, but even at home, the law of the sword has
replaced the laws of the United Kingdom.

King Sharia rules across Europe, violence and brutality is his penal
code, and the silence and complacency of nations is his throne. The
challenge is to uproot that throne before it hardens and becomes
permanent. Before custom becomes law, that generations have grown up with.

And the paradox is that it is the very people aiding Muslim immigration

who have the most to suffer from it. The ideal of a liberal society is

incompatible with a Muslim society. The two cannot and will not

co-exist for long. Either the Sword of Islam of the Guarantees of

Human Freedom must prevail.













No comments:

Post a Comment