The Bush Islamic Doctrine
We were introduced the power of political Islam on September 11, 2001. For
a few people 9/11 was a declaration of war against our civilization and those
people have been struggling against Islam. It is time to stop and ask: How are
we doing? We are losing on every front.
A definition: Kafirs are the non-Muslims who are fighting against Islam. Dhimmis
are the apologists for Islam—the media, Obama, George Bush, the professors,
preachers, priests, politicians, pundits and rabbis.
Why are the kafirs losing? Because Islam is so strong? No, because we are waging
war with a strategy that is destined to fail. We are losing because we using
a losing strategy. George Bush planted the seeds of our strategy when he declared
that 9/11 was an act of terrorists and he laid out the strategy that would lead
to our cultural self-destruction. Here is the Bush Islamic doctrine:
· Islam is a religion similar to Christianity. Christians, Jews and
Muslims all worship the same god.
· The problem is terrorism, not Islam, hence, “The War on Terror.”
· There are moderate Muslims and a few extremist Muslims.
· A good Muslim means that Islam is good.
· “Radicals” cause the violence.
· Islam is found in the Koran.
· The “bad stuff” in the Koran is just how it is interpreted.
· Good Muslims will reform the “terrorists.”
Not a single item is true. Each and every one is false and has no basis in
Islamic doctrine. But everybody bought it. Why? For the same reason that Bush
said it. It was the academic doctrine of Islam that the Ivy League taught. The
media, professors, preachers, priests, politicians, pundits and rabbis had all
been taught the same doctrine to interpret Islam. The Bush doctrine is not only
unquestioned, but now has achieved the status of revealed truth. To deny it
is to be a bigot.
So Bush did not create the doctrine, he was just a spokesman for the elites.
There is a great irony in calling it the Bush doctrine, since more progressives/liberals/Leftists/Democrats
believe it than do conservatives. Boxer, Reid, Pelosi and Obama are advocates
of the Bush doctrine.
Let’s see how the Bush doctrine works to prevent actual learning about
the truth of Islam. Take the jihad in Mumbai, India where several Jews and hundreds
of Hindus were injured and murdered. The words “Islam” and “Muslims”
were barely mentioned by the media. The problem was terrorism, not jihad. The
dhimmis did not want to malign the moderate Muslims by bringing up the Islam
angle. It was just a few radicals who had highjacked Islam who attacked the
kafirs in Mumbai.
How many mindless (mindless on the part of the Christians and Jews) interfaith
dialogues have we seen? Religious leaders all get on stage and go on about how
they worship the same god. Not one of these so-called Christian and Jewish leaders
has actually read the Koran. It is the Koran that defines Allah and if you don’t
know what is in it, you don’t know anything about Allah. But not to worry.
The Bush doctrine holds it to be true and that is enough. What religious leader
has had the time over the last eight years to read the Koran or the life of
Mohammed? They have had plenty of time, but they don’t need to do so; they
are comforted by the lies of the Bush doctrine.
The Cork in the Bottle
Let’s say that you are talking to a dhimmi and you bring up some evil
of Islam. What do they say?
· Christians did bad things, too.
· There is violence in the Bible, too.
· They (jihadis) are some fundamentalist/radical types. All fundamentalists
are bad. Most Muslims are just like everybody else.
· The ultimate mind cork: “I know this Muslim at work. He is nice. Subtext: I can’t hear you.” (A good Muslim means that Islam
is good.)
Every thrust is parried with the Bush doctrine of Islam. The Bush doctrine
is the cork in the bottle. Every time we try to pour some wine of truth into
a dhimmi’s head, it is corked by the Bush doctrine.
Terror
And how have we responded to the Bush Islamic doctrine? For the most part,
we have bought the Bush terror model of Islam. We try to stuff everything into
terror/jihad. Since no one likes terror/jihad, it can be condemned. But Islam
is very clever. There are four kinds of jihad—sword, pen, tongue and money.
If they skip the terror part and go straight to the soft jihad, then the kafirs
talking about the terror/jihad approach to Islam are soon ignored. The media
skips the terror/jihad now. There have been numerous jihadist events in America,
but the FBI and the media never admit that Islam is involved. The worst was
Mumbai, India. It was pure jihad, the attack on the Jews proved that, but Islam
and the Muslims were never mentioned. No Islam here. Move right along. There
is no man behind the curtain.
The terror approach bears a relationship to crying “Wolf!” After while,
no one really worries about terror and the lack of it proves that Islam is good.
The major problem with dealing with “terror” is that it takes away
from watching the real destructive force in America—Sharia law and the
slow Islamification of our culture.
Education and Debate
When you are trying to educate someone about Islam, it helps to go over the
Bush doctrine and point out that not a single statement in it is true. Up front,
challenge their beliefs.
Bill Warner
copyright (c) CBSX, LLC
politicalislam.com Use and distribute
as you wish; do not edit and give us credit.
|
 |
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment