April 6, 2009
by Jeffrey Imm
Responsible for Equality And
Liberty (R.E.A.L.)
http://www.realcourage.org/2009/04/one-world/
http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/blog/imm-articles/135.html
What world do you live in? This should be a simple question for anyone
to answer - Earth. But some have fallen into using the language of
policy wonks that the world actually has multiple "worlds" within it.
For example, you continually hear references to "the Muslim world,"
including President Obama's
recent comments to the press. What is exactly is a "Muslim world,"
and why would we accept segregation of part of the world to only belong to
one identity group?
If government leaders, policy makers, and the press started referring to
"the white world," "the black world," "the Christian world," etc.,
wouldn't we be asking them "what are you talking about"?
But the segregationist concept of a so-called "Muslim world" is so
ingrained and accepted within foreign policy dialogue that we continue
to see the use of this phrase. This includes people that know better. I
was recently asked about a challenge in the "Muslim world." As I stated
then, our biggest problem with Islamic supremacism as an ideology is the
idea that we would ever accept a segregationist concept as a "Muslim
world."
How can we be
responsible for equality and liberty as universal human rights, but
on the other hand give credence to the idea that part of our shared
Earth should be segregated as a so-called "Muslim world"? Or any other
type of "world," other than one world -- our shared Earth?
Presumably what such people mean to say is that they are referring to
areas that are predominantly populated by individuals that follow some
form of Islam. As you can see, it is much quicker to simply say "Muslim
world."
But such expediency in terminology is really wrong. Imagine us
fighting 1960s segregation in America by being willing to accept the
concept that there should be a "white America" versus a "black America."
Just like we are a United States of America, we also have just
one world.
The idea that there is a "Muslim world" sets expectations that
segregation in the 21st century is somehow acceptable. It sets
expectations that our universal truths of human equality and liberty can
somehow be only partially accepted to accommodate so-called "local
cultures." In our global dialogue and policies, we simply cannot accept
setting expectations that we accept segregation of the world or that we
accept anything less than the universality of human equality and
liberty.
In 2007, then Senator Barack Obama
defined the enemy to freedom. In addressing "the war we need to
win," he
stated that America's enemies "seek to create a repressive
caliphate. To defeat this enemy, we must understand who we are fighting
against, and what we are fighting for." However, it is precisely the
concept of a "Muslim world" that those who "seek to create a repressive
caliphate" are fighting for. There is only one world, not a world that
can be segregated into a "Muslim world." So when President Obama
tells the press of the need for "partnership with the Muslim world,"
he needs to go back and think about how we accept a segregation of a
so-called "Muslim world," while challenging those who seek to create a
caliphate (which
he has identified as our enemies).
As Barack Obama has also
told us, we also "must understand... what we are fighting for." We
are fighting for more than tactics, more than maneuvers, and more than
individual theaters of battle. If we are not fighting for the universal
human rights of equality and liberty as our first priority, then we
better step back and ask what indeed we are fighting for.
The universal
human rights of equality and liberty are not an attempt at political
"hegemony," and they are not an attempt to control others. There are
many who find the idea of freedom to be terribly inconvenient to their
"local cultures." But freedom is not merely about convenience, freedom
is not merely about popularity, freedom is not merely about adapting,
and the right to human freedom is not merely your or my opinion. The
freedoms of human equality and liberty are a
universal
truth of human rights.
These truths are declared as fundamental to our identity as human beings
- no matter who we are, where we live, and what we do. Our government
leaders must never forget these basic truths on human rights.
On April 4, 2009, President Obama was
asked about an Islamic supremacist law signed by President Karzai in
Afghanistan that would
legalize rape and
oppression of Muslim women. President Obama
stated that "we think that it is very important for us to be
sensitive to local culture, but we also think that there
are certain basic principles that all nations should
uphold, and respect for women and respect for their freedom and
integrity is an important principle." (emphasis added)
Universal truths of human rights are universal. If America ever starts
believing that we can be "sensitive to local culture(s)" that legalize
any attack on the universal truths of human equality and liberty, then
we no longer accept such universal truths of human equality and liberty.
We must start by rejecting the very concept of a segregated "Muslim
world." Moreover, our responsibility for equality and liberty to
all human beings, including Muslim women, must never be hesitant,
halting, or situational.
We don't THINK that there are "basic principles that all nations
should uphold," we KNOW that the universal truths of human
equality and liberty apply everywhere and to every culture. That is what
"universal" means. That is what "truths" mean. We don't think all
nations SHOULD uphold these rights, we believe it is the RIGHT
of every individual in the world to human equality and liberty.
Such truths are not just a good idea, and they are not just malleable
opinions dependent on "local cultures." We have only one world. We have
only one humanity. All of humanity in our shared Earth has the human
rights of equality and liberty. This is not a question. This is not an
opinion. This is not just what we "think," whether we are an average
citizen or we are a president.
We hold these truths to be self-evident.
__._,_.___
If reposting elsewhere, please credit source of this research as UnitedStatesAction.com
__,_._,___
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment