|
This war of the Global
Islamic Movement versus the Free World is primarily a war of
narratives. One narrative says what ISIS, Al Qaeda and all of
the other jihadi organizations are doing has nothing to do with
Islam.
The other side of this coin
is called truth.
As UTT has documented in
articles here,
here,
here,
here
and here
and in videos here,
here, and here, there is
only one Islam and one sharia. All sharia mandates jihad until
the world is under Islamic rule, and sharia only defines jihad as
"warfare against non-muslims."
There is no other
"version" of Islam.
The heads of state of all
56 muslim nations on earth are party to the OIC (Organisation of
Islamic Cooperation), which approved the Cairo Declaration on Human
Rights on Islam and served it to the United Nations in 1993.
The Cairo Declaration officially states the Islamic world
legally defines "Human Rights" as the imposition of sharia
on the entire world.
Therefore, the leaders of
all Islamic nations on earth have the same understanding of human
rights as ISIS and Al Qaeda
The Islamic Movement's
primary strategy is to control the narrative about Islam in order to
keep the very people who need the truth to do their jobs ignorant
about Islam. This includes leaders in the key sectors of our
society: political, media, educational, religious, national
security, military and law enforcement.
Propagating a
counter-factual understanding of Islam allows the enemy to wage
Civilization Jihad by OUR hands, and get our leaders to do their
bidding for them.
In 2005, the U.S.
government wrote the constitutions for Iraq and Afghanistan creating
Islamic republics under sharia. We did that and in the process
achieved Al Qaeda's goals for them. That is Civilization Jihad
by OUR hands.
Propaganda to support the
enemy's strategy comes from a variety of sources.
"Moderate muslims" are one of the most dangerous
groups which continues to be pushed to the forefront as the
"saviors" of this war.
The first prominent
"moderate" muslim in America shoved down our throats was
Abdurahman Alamoudi, who was the Islamic advisor President Clinton
who created the muslim chaplain program for the Department of
Defense. Alamoudi turned out to be an Al Qaeda financier
involved in a plot with Al Qaeda operatives to kill Saudi Prince
Abdullah. He is in jail now.
The next muslim we were
told by the media was the "new face of moderate Islam" was
Anwar al Awlaki. When he was not giving talks about Islam at the U.S.
Capitol and the Pentagon, he gave Islamic legal counsel to 9/11
hijackers, Major Nidal Hassan (Ft Hood jihadi), and others, and was
the leader of Al Qaeda in Yemen. The United States killed him
with a drone strike in 2011. He is dead now.
Now we have
"moderate" muslims all around us being used to
"educate" our leaders about Islam. We have
suit-wearing jihadis like Mohamed Magid, Sayyid Syeed, and Salam al
Marayati, who are all Muslim Brotherhood/Hamas leaders, warmly welcomed
into churches, government offices, and public functions.
Then we have Raheel Raza,
Qanta Ahmed, Zuhdi Jasser and others who propagate the message that
"their version of Islam" does not condone what the
"terrorists" says it does. They tell us they are
"devout Muslims" who are "anti-sharia."
This is irreconcilable
nonsense
The difference is that
leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood, no matter how nice they dress or
talk, are enemies of the United States and should be treated as such.
Raheel Raza may truly
believe what she says and may be a pleasant woman. The point is
that her message supports the enemy's narrative. Since this is
primarily a war of narratives, that puts her in the enemy camp, even
if she does not intend to be there.
The emotional connection
many Americans have to the likes of Raza and the others make the
truth of this reality difficult for some to swallow.
Nonetheless, it is the truth. Some are unable to detach
their emotions from their intellect and see that to be a tool of the
enemy makes a person an asset of the enemy, whether he/she intends
that or not.
When it comes to officials
inside the Trump administration, the problem also becomes more
difficult for people to receive because of the fierce loyalty of
President Trump's supporters.
With regards to Mr. Trump's
National Security Advisor Herbert McMaster, UTT does not dispute his
war record or his desire to do what he believes is best for his
country. Desire has little to do with this.
One does not have to know
or understand he/she is a tool for our enemy.
As UTT documented in last
week's article here
and in our recent video here, Mr.
McMaster is ignorant of Islamic doctrine (sharia) and does not appear
to concur with Richard Higgins' assessment that a coalition of
Marxists and Islamists are working together to overthrow the United
States, despite a mountain of evidence to support this reality.
Thus, when Mr. McMaster
keeps people inside the White House who he believes have a more
"measured" perspective yet are also ignorant of the Islamic
threat - many of whom support former President Obama - and he purges
the all of the people who do, in fact, understand Islamic doctrine
and how the enemy intends to win this war - like Richard Higgins -
that is Civilization Jihad by OUR hands, whether Mr. McMaster knows
it or not.
Anyone who is unaware that
Islamic sharia supports what ISIS and Al Qaeda are doing and that the
Muslim Brotherhood's by-laws and strategic plans call for the overthrow
of the U.S. government does not understand this war. That makes
such a person ignorant or complicit. Either way that person
need not work in the national security realm.
Anyone who gives a platform
to "moderate muslims" or anyone else who speaks
untruthfully about Islam serves the objectives of our enemy and,
therefore, stands in the enemy's camp.
To read this article online click HERE
To read more articles from Understanding the
Threat (UTT) click HERE
To subscribe to UTT's YouTube Channel click HERE
Follow us on TWITTER @UTT_USA
Listen to UTT's Radio Show at WorldviewRadio.com
Click on "John Guandolo"
New 30 minute radio show every Monday morning!!!
|
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment