Tuesday, December 5, 2017

France: Islamism in the Heart of the State

In this mailing:
  • Yves Mamou: France: Islamism in the Heart of the State
  • Khadija Khan: UK: Perversions of Justice
  • A. Z. Mohamed: Religious Hate Crimes, USA.: Jews, Not Muslims, Still Key Victims
  • Alan M. Dershowitz: Why Did Flynn Lie and Why Did Mueller Charge Him with Lying?

France: Islamism in the Heart of the State

by Yves Mamou  •  December 5, 2017 at 5:00 am
  • On all questions dedicated to immigration and Islam, France's Council of State has become an Islamo-leftist body, dedicated to encouraging Muslim immigration and protecting the expansion of Islam and Islamism in France.
  • The government wanted to expel foreign workers immediately after the cancellation of their work permit. Due to the Council of State, deportation was delayed by 24 hours, enough time to allow them to escape and become permanent illegal immigrants.
  • Maybe the elites are looking for "redemption" after France colonized parts of Africa. They are forgetting, however, that it was Muslims who colonized the Middle East, the Christian Byzantine Empire, North Africa, Greece, much of Eastern Europe and Asia, Northern Cyprus and Spain.
On all questions dedicated to immigration and Islam, France's Council of State (Conseil d'État) has become an Islamo-leftist body, dedicated to encouraging Muslim immigration and protecting the expansion of Islam and Islamism in France. (Image source: Lino Bento/Flickr)
On October 25, 2017, the highest French administrative court, the Council of State (Conseil d'État), ordered the removal of a Roman Catholic cross from the top of a monument dedicated to Pope John Paul II in a public square in Ploërmel, Britanny. According to the France's highest administrative court, this cross was said to violate the secular nature of the State. Not the statue of the ex-pope John Paul II by itself; just the cross above it.
Social media, in France and abroad -- especially in Poland where John Paul II was born -- flew into an immediate uproar: How could the government of a country considered the "eldest daughter of the Catholic church" ask for the removal of a Catholic cross in a tiny village that nobody even knew about before this incident?

UK: Perversions of Justice
Emboldening Muslim Pedophiles, Discrediting Law Enforcers

by Khadija Khan  •  December 5, 2017 at 4:30 am
  • That the British government turned on the chief executive of the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners, Nazir Afzal -- a pioneer of the campaign to rescue under-aged girls from the drugging, torture and rape of violent criminals -- is beyond shocking.
  • While the British authorities made a concerted effort to sweep the identity of the pedophiles under the carpet, the perpetrators themselves proudly shouted "Allahu Akbar" ("Allah is the greatest") in the courtroom after they were convicted and sentenced.
  • Boys educated by their fathers and radical clerics to view women as chattel would be likely to grow up as misogynists. Accounts from the female family members of some of the convicts in the grooming cases revealed a monstrous hatred for women in general, and non-Muslim women in particular.
  • It is bad enough that women and girls in the Middle East are inferior in the eyes of their families and the law. Yet, for Britain to look the other way, if not sanction, practices that are anathema to a democracy that prides itself on human rights, is a perversion of justice to Britons of all backgrounds, including law-abiding Muslims.
Nazir Afzal was shunned by certain groups of fellow Muslims for his part, as Chief Crown Prosecutor, in bringing the Rochdale "grooming gang" to justice, while openly attributing their misogyny to radical Islam. (Image source: United States Mission Geneva)
The former Manchester police detective who exposed a pedophile ring in Rochdale -- and resigned in 2012 over the failure of the system to bring the perpetrators to justice -- recently broke her silence. She told the British press about the abuse to which she was subjected in her department for attempting to reveal that the perpetrators were Muslim men of Pakistani origin.

Religious Hate Crimes, USA.: Jews, Not Muslims, Still Key Victims

by A. Z. Mohamed  •  December 5, 2017 at 4:00 am
  • Hate crimes -- defined as those directed at someone "based on his race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or ethnicity" -- are not only illegal; they are immoral and should not be tolerated.
  • However, we must not allow the dictates of political correctness, according to which "Islamophobia" is the most rampant form of bias in America, to cloud the reality that anti-Semitism is still more widespread.
Prof. Brian Levin, director of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University, San Bernardino. (Image source: CNN video screenshot via CSUSB)
In a prepared statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee on May 2, 2017, Prof. Brian Levin -- director of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University, San Bernardino -- stated, "Hate crime, especially those based on religion, have [sic] increased in recent periods."
Levin, who has dealt extensively with the topic for decades -- analyzing statistics, compiling data and advising American and European policy-makers -- argued that one of the problems involved in tracking hate crimes in the U.S. is that some states do not cooperate in collecting or reporting on the information. Another, he said, is that there is no uniform way in which different bodies (such as the FBI and the Anti-Defamation League) receive and investigate complaints.

Why Did Flynn Lie and Why Did Mueller Charge Him with Lying?

by Alan M. Dershowitz  •  December 5, 2017 at 3:00 am
Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn. (Image source: Defense Intelligence Agency/Staff Sgt. Jonathan Lovelady)
The charge to which retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn has pleaded guilty may tell us a great deal about the Robert Mueller investigation.
The first question is, why did Flynn lie? People who lie to the FBI generally do so because, if they told the truth, they would be admitting to a crime. But the two conversations that Flynn falsely denied having were not criminal. He may have believed they were criminal but, if he did, he was wrong.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS

Donate




No comments:

Post a Comment