In this mailing:
- Yves Mamou: France: Islamism
in the Heart of the State
- Khadija Khan: UK: Perversions
of Justice
- A. Z. Mohamed: Religious Hate
Crimes, USA.: Jews, Not Muslims, Still Key Victims
- Alan M. Dershowitz: Why Did Flynn Lie
and Why Did Mueller Charge Him with Lying?
by Yves Mamou • December 5, 2017
at 5:00 am
- On all questions
dedicated to immigration and Islam, France's Council of State
has become an Islamo-leftist body, dedicated to encouraging
Muslim immigration and protecting the expansion of Islam and
Islamism in France.
- The government
wanted to expel foreign workers immediately after the
cancellation of their work permit. Due to the Council of
State, deportation was delayed by 24 hours, enough time to
allow them to escape and become permanent illegal immigrants.
- Maybe the elites are
looking for "redemption" after France colonized
parts of Africa. They are forgetting, however, that it was
Muslims who colonized the Middle East, the Christian Byzantine
Empire, North Africa, Greece, much of Eastern Europe and Asia,
Northern Cyprus and Spain.
On all
questions dedicated to immigration and Islam, France's Council of
State (Conseil d'État) has become an Islamo-leftist body, dedicated
to encouraging Muslim immigration and protecting the expansion of
Islam and Islamism in France. (Image source: Lino Bento/Flickr)
On October 25, 2017, the highest French
administrative court, the Council of State (Conseil d'État),
ordered the removal of a Roman Catholic cross from the top of a
monument dedicated to Pope John Paul II in a public square in
Ploërmel, Britanny. According to the France's highest
administrative court, this cross was said to violate the secular
nature of the State. Not the statue of the ex-pope John Paul II by
itself; just the cross above it.
Social media, in France and abroad -- especially in
Poland where John Paul II was born -- flew into an immediate
uproar: How could the government of a country considered the
"eldest daughter of the Catholic church" ask for the
removal of a Catholic cross in a tiny village that nobody even knew
about before this incident?
UK:
Perversions of Justice
Emboldening Muslim Pedophiles, Discrediting Law
Enforcers
by Khadija Khan • December 5,
2017 at 4:30 am
- That the British
government turned on the chief executive of the Association of
Police and Crime Commissioners, Nazir Afzal -- a pioneer of
the campaign to rescue under-aged girls from the drugging,
torture and rape of violent criminals -- is beyond shocking.
- While the British
authorities made a concerted effort to sweep the identity of
the pedophiles under the carpet, the perpetrators themselves
proudly shouted "Allahu Akbar" ("Allah is the
greatest") in the courtroom after they were convicted and
sentenced.
- Boys educated by
their fathers and radical clerics to view women as chattel
would be likely to grow up as misogynists. Accounts from the
female family members of some of the convicts in the grooming
cases revealed a monstrous hatred for women in general, and
non-Muslim women in particular.
- It is bad enough
that women and girls in the Middle East are inferior in the
eyes of their families and the law. Yet, for Britain to look
the other way, if not sanction, practices that are anathema to
a democracy that prides itself on human rights, is a
perversion of justice to Britons of all backgrounds, including
law-abiding Muslims.
Nazir
Afzal was shunned by certain groups of fellow Muslims for his part,
as Chief Crown Prosecutor, in bringing the Rochdale "grooming
gang" to justice, while openly attributing their misogyny to
radical Islam. (Image source: United States Mission Geneva)
The former Manchester police detective who exposed a
pedophile ring in Rochdale -- and resigned in 2012 over the failure
of the system to bring the perpetrators to justice -- recently
broke her silence. She told the British press about the abuse to
which she was subjected in her department for attempting to reveal
that the perpetrators were Muslim men of Pakistani origin.
by A. Z. Mohamed • December 5,
2017 at 4:00 am
- Hate crimes --
defined as those directed at someone "based on his race,
religion, disability, sexual orientation, or ethnicity"
-- are not only illegal; they are immoral and should not be
tolerated.
- However, we must not
allow the dictates of political correctness, according to
which "Islamophobia" is the most rampant form of
bias in America, to cloud the reality that anti-Semitism is
still more widespread.
Prof.
Brian Levin, director of the Center for the Study of Hate and
Extremism at California State University, San Bernardino. (Image
source: CNN video screenshot via CSUSB)
In a prepared statement to the Senate Judiciary
Committee on May 2, 2017, Prof. Brian Levin -- director of the
Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University,
San Bernardino -- stated, "Hate crime, especially those based
on religion, have [sic] increased in recent periods."
Levin, who has dealt extensively with the topic for
decades -- analyzing statistics, compiling data and advising
American and European policy-makers -- argued that one of the
problems involved in tracking hate crimes in the U.S. is that some
states do not cooperate in collecting or reporting on the
information. Another, he said, is that there is no uniform way in
which different bodies (such as the FBI and the Anti-Defamation
League) receive and investigate complaints.
by Alan M. Dershowitz • December
5, 2017 at 3:00 am
Lt. Gen.
Michael Flynn. (Image source: Defense Intelligence Agency/Staff
Sgt. Jonathan Lovelady)
The charge to which retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn
has pleaded guilty may tell us a great deal about the Robert Mueller
investigation.
The first question is, why did Flynn lie? People who
lie to the FBI generally do so because, if they told the truth,
they would be admitting to a crime. But the two conversations that
Flynn falsely denied having were not criminal. He may have believed
they were criminal but, if he did, he was wrong.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment