Monday, December 24, 2012

Eye on Iran: Tougher EU Sanctions Against Iran Come into Force








For continuing coverage follow us on Twitter and join our Facebook group.
  
Top Stories

Reuters:
"Rigorous new sanctions against Iran's banking, shipping and industrial sectors took effect on Saturday, as part of the European Union's effort to force Tehran to scale back its nuclear program. The sanctions, agreed in October, entered EU law with their publication in the European Union's Official Journal on Saturday. The toughest EU measures yet, they include bans on financial transactions, sales to Iran of shipping equipment and steel, and imports of Iranian natural gas, adding to earlier bans, including on the OPEC producer's oil. They reflect heightened concern over Iran's nuclear goals and Israeli threats to attack Iranian atomic installations if diplomacy and other measures fail to deliver a solution... The new sanctions mark a significant change of policy for the 27-member bloc, which previously sought mainly to target specific people and companies with economic restrictions. It has lagged the United States in imposing blanket industry bans because it is anxious to avoid penalizing ordinary Iranian citizens, while punishing the Tehran government... The new European measures make clear natural gas shipments are prohibited in any form and swapping, as opposed to simply buying, cargoes is also outlawed... In a statement, the European Commission said the new law brought the number of entities subject to sanctions to 490 and the total number of persons to 105. The latest companies added to the banned list include energy and steel distribution firms and financial companies." http://t.uani.com/V1pZ5Y

AFP: "Iran is engaged in a 'smart economic war' with Western powers whose sanctions against its nuclear programme are hurting some Iranians, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Saturday. 'Targeted sanctions, which the enemies say are supposed to be crippling, have led to a drop in our oil' sales, Ahmadinejad said in a live interview on state television, referring to an oil embargo imposed by the European Union. 'They do not even let us transfer the oil money,' he said. 'They thought Iran's economy would break down, but it did not.' 'Iran is engaged in a smart economic war with the enemy,' he said... Ahmadinejad said his government had 'so far managed to control' the effects of sanctions on the economy but admitted that 'heavy pressure had been exerted on some Iranians because of sanctions.' He did not elaborate on how Iran was fighting off sanctions for fear the methods would be found by Western powers trying to goad Iran back to the negotiating table over its nuclear ambitions. 'I cannot say what heavy pressure the enemy has imposed, and how we are dealing with them.' 'We have so far managed to control this blow, and it hasn't turned out the way they predicted,' he said." http://t.uani.com/Upb7Rn

Radio Zamaneh: "The Spanish satellite company Hispasat has stopped airing Press TV and Hispan TV as of Friday December 21 and ordered Overon, another satellite company, to follow suit. Hispasat's removal of the Islamic Republic state channels comes after a similar move by the French company Eutelsat, which also owns part of Hispasat. According to Overon, the European union's blacklisting of Ezatollah Zarghami, the head of the Islamic Republic broadcaster Seda-va-Sima, has led to the decision to follow 'a wider interpretation of the EU regulations.' Iran says that Hispan TV is officially registered in Spain and has been operating under the media regulations of that country. Iranian officials say they will take legal action against the recent 'wave of new European and American attacks against Iranian media.'" http://t.uani.com/Upbzzh
MTN Banner 
Nuclear Program

NYT: "South Korean technicians scrutinizing the debris of the North Korean rocket launched this month have found evidence suggesting the rocket's military purposes and the North's technological ties with Iran in its efforts to develop an intercontinental ballistic missile, South Korean officials said Sunday... For an oxidizer, North Korea used red fuming nitric acid, commonly used as rocket propellant in old Soviet-built Scud missiles, as well as in Iranian and North Korean missiles, the official said. Most space-program rockets use liquid oxygen as an oxidizer, he said. Unlike liquid oxygen, which must be kept extremely cold, red fuming nitric acid can be stored at room temperature, which makes it a convenient propellant for missiles, the official said. The design of the oxidizer tank also suggested an 'Iran connection' in North Korea's rocket program, he said." http://t.uani.com/W1QRSk

Sanctions

AP: "Iran's oil minister claimed Sunday his country has successfully overcome sanctions on the sale of its oil, state TV reported... Oil Minister Rostam Ghasemi that the industry was in 'bad shape' about two months ago because of the oil embargo, 'but resorting to planning in the oil industry, we left the bottleneck behind, almost.' The EU imposed its embargo in July. Ghasemi said Iran's oil sector would be able to export its oil to the 'farthest spots' around the world. In contrast, China, India and Korea recently announced that they have cut back their oil imports from Iran to comply with international sanctions. Ghasemi also said that Iran has set up its own insurance for oil tankers after Western companies refused to cover them. 'By revoking insurance, the West disrupted transportation of oil, the most important part' of trade, Ghasemi was quoted as saying. He said since a large portion of Iran's revenue comes from oil exports, 'the embargo is a very important issue.'" http://t.uani.com/ZviMSx

AFP: "Iran has warned China it could cancel a much-delayed $5-billion offshore gas exploration contract in the Gulf, a news agency said on Monday. 'There is a possibility of cancelling the contract' signed in 2009 to develop the South Pars gas field -- which holds around eight percent of the world's gas reserves -- Mehr news quoted oil ministry spokesman Alireza Nikzad as saying... South Pars, a huge offshore natural gas field shared between Iran and Qatar, holds around 14 trillion cubic metres of gas, and Iran plans to use the 'phase 11' project to fill its first-ever liquefied natural gas plant. Mehr named China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), the Asian giant's largest oil and gas producer and supplier, as the company contracted for the project." http://t.uani.com/WL0tXJ

Syrian Uprising

Reuters: "The installation of Patriot anti-missile batteries sent by NATO members to bolster Turkey's defenses against a possible missile attack from Syria will only harm Turkey's security, Iran's defense minister was quoted as saying on Saturday. NATO approved Turkey's request for the air defense system earlier this month, in a move meant to calm Ankara's fears of being hit by Syrian missiles... 'The installation of Patriot missiles in Turkey plays no role in establishing Turkey's security and this harms the country of Turkey,' Iranian Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi said on Saturday, according to the Iranian Students' News Agency (ISNA). 'The West has always pursued its viewpoints and interests and we disagree with the presence of Western countries in regional interactions.'" http://t.uani.com/ROw6OF

Regional Meddling

Reuters: "Saudi Arabia on Monday told regional rival Iran to stop interfering in internal Gulf Arab affairs and spreading 'sedition', activities Tehran denies. The comments, made by Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal, follow similar allegations leveled at Iran by the kingdom in the past, and other Gulf states are likely to voice similar complaints at a summit of the six-nation Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) that opens later on Monday. 'Interference to stir sedition is unacceptable from a neighbor,' Prince Saud was quoted as saying by the London-based, Saudi-owned daily al-Hayat. 'This is not comfortable because it is trying to use the circumstances to interfere.'" http://t.uani.com/U6Gug3

Opinion & Analysis

Jackson Diehl in WashPost: "Back at the beginning of 2006, Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) made waves in Washington by predicting that the United States could ultimately have to choose between allowing Iran to go nuclear and taking military action to stop it. Pretty much every year since then, someone's New Year's forecast has had that fateful choice finally coming before the president. For seven years, it hasn't happened. But will 2013 be different? The conventional wisdom I've heard from diplomats in Washington this month says probably not. Most likely, it goes, next year will look like previous years: Negotiations will limp along inconclusively. Iran will make incremental progress on uranium enrichment, while stopping short of steps that would provoke a U.S. or Israeli attack. But there's a good case to be made that next year will finally bring a break in the Iranian standoff - by means of a military confrontation, the appearance of an Iranian bomb or a diplomatic deal of some kind. And interestingly, one of the people making that case is President Obama's first-term adviser on Iran, Dennis Ross, who has worked on the Middle East in five administrations. Ross, who left the Obama White House at the end of 2011, concedes that prognosticators of an Iran crisis have a long losing streak. His reasons that next year will be different boil down to three: an approaching Iranian 'breakout' capacity; Obama's stated determination to prevent it; and the slow emergence of an economic and political climate in Iran that could prompt Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei to change course. What is a 'breakout capacity?' As Ross points out, Obama himself defined it in the third presidential debate in October. It 'means that we would not be able to intervene in time to stop their nuclear program,' the president said. In other words, Iran would have acquired enough nuclear infrastructure and stockpiles of medium-enriched uranium that it could manufacture a bomb in a matter of a few weeks - before it could be detected by Western intelligence agencies or international inspectors. 'That clock is ticking,' Obama said... Ross has been arguing for some time that Obama should put such a comprehensive offer on the table. He thinks the present talks, in which Iran is being offered a modest easing of sanctions in exchange for halting its higher-level enrichment and shipping much of its stockpile out of the country, won't work. 'There's a structural problem,' he says. 'The Iranian perception is that they are being asked to give a diamond in exchange for a candy bar.' But would Khamenei ever accept a big deal? Ross, who urged Obama to make that bet in his first term, sees some signs that the Iranian leadership and state-controlled media are setting up a climate in which the supreme leader could make such a decision. The reasons to do so would be two-fold: the damage to the economy from sanctions; and a conviction that in the absence of a deal there would be a U.S. attack. For the moment, Ross says, the Iranians 'are not convinced we are prepared to use force.' Consequently, he says, 'at this point I would still put the prospects for diplomacy at less than 50-50.' And: 'If by the end of 2013 diplomacy hasn't worked, the prospects for use of force become quite high.' Happy New Year." http://t.uani.com/WKWTNj

Nazila Fathi in FP: "Iran's Ministry of Intelligence did something remarkable last month: It used its website to publish a report (link in Farsi) calling for direct talks with the country's foe, the United States. In the report, entitled 'The Zionist Regime's Reasons and Obstacles for Attacking Iran,' the traditionally hawkish ministry highlighted the benefits of diplomacy and negotiations with the United States: 'One way to fend off a possible war is to resort to diplomacy and to use all international capacities.' The authors took care to draw a line between the approaches currently taken towards Iran's nuclear program by the U.S. and Israel, Iran's archenemy. President Obama, the report's authors wrote, 'hopes to solve this issue peacefully and through diplomacy' -- in contrast to Israel, which, it said, favors a unilateral strike against Iran's nuclear facilities. By implementing 'severe sanctions,' the report contended, Obama is actually trying to control the situation without resorting to military action. The text concluded that there is a high risk of war and 'it is an unforgiveable sin not to prevent it.' The Ministry of Intelligence report signals an intriguing shift in the Iranian political landscape. The ministry, a key player in the power structure of the Islamic Republic, could have chosen to use its considerable leverage to influence the debate internally -- but instead it chose, in an entirely unprecedented way, to enter a public debate. The man who runs the Ministry of Intelligence, Heydar Moslehi, is no outsider; he is, in fact, a confidant of the supreme religious leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has the final word on all matters of state. Ayatollah Khamenei habitually refers to the United States as 'the enemy' and has denounced negotiations... The most likely reason for the shift is the dire state of Iran's economy. International sanctions leveled against the country because of its nuclear program are having a devastating effect. Inflation is soaring, sparking worries among ordinary people and government officials alike. Demonstrations rocked Tehran's bazaar in October after the Iranian currency, the rial, collapsed 40 percent against the U.S. dollar. Local newspapers are filled with daily reports on the effects of skyrocketing prices around the country. The European Union and the United States have enforced crippling sanctions in recent months. The measures have led to a sharp decline in Iran's oil revenues. European countries that used to buy 20 percent of Iran's oil have suspended their imports since July. Other countries, such as China and India, have sharply reduced their imports under pressure from the international community. An embargo on the Iranian financial sector blocks its banking system from transferring money. American and European firms, fearing hefty fines, refuse to do business with Iran. U.S. authorities have levied hundreds of millions of dollars in fines against Standard Chartered Bank and HSBC for moving Iranian money through the U.S. financial system... There are other signs that pressure is building among powerful lobbies close to Khamenei. Mohammad Javad Larijani, secretary of Iran's High Council for Human Rights, who is also close to the Supreme Leader, said recently in a televised interview that Iran and the U.S. need to deal directly. 'To protect the interests of our system, we would negotiate with the U.S. or anyone else even in the abyss of hell,' he said. Iran's economy is expected to suffer one of its worst contractions. The Economist Intelligence Unit, a London-based think-tank, estimates that it will shrink to $70 billion this year from $80 billion in 2011. Inflation is galloping at 25 percent, according to the International Monetary Fund. The rial has lost 300 percent of its value over the past year... Some analysts compare Iran's ten-year effort to build its nuclear program with its dogged conduct in its bloody, eight-year war with Iraq in the 1980s. Back then, the founder of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, wanted to defy the West and show the strength of his nation by continuing the fight against Saddam Hussein. In 1988, under pressure from close aides and a society devastated by the war, Khomeini finally agreed to accept a ceasefire. He compared it with 'drinking the cup of poison.' There is no sign yet that Ayatollah Khamenei might be willing to drink a similar cup of poison and settle for a compromise over the nuclear program. He has repeatedly dismissed the effects of the sanctions. But a few weeks ago he called them 'savage,' acknowledging indirectly, for the first time, that they were hurting the country." http://t.uani.com/12ApaGG

Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com

United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons.  UANI is an issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of nuclear weapons.

No comments:

Post a Comment