Thursday, June 6, 2013

Eye on Iran: Dictator's Account - Now Also Pressure on Twitter











For continuing coverage follow us on Twitter and join our Facebook group.
  
Top Stories

Die Welt (German): "Twitter is now subject to criticism for hosting the accounts of Iranian officials who are forcibly denying their electorate access to the internet in their country. Recently, the American lobbying organization United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) appealed in an open letter to Facebook, calling for a shutdown of the Supreme Spiritual Leader Ali Khamenei's site. Now the initiators have contacted Twitter in relation to Khamenei's account: 'The Iranian regime is using the account to spread its propaganda, while it excludes its own citizens from Twitter,' reads a letter from UANI boss Mark Wallace, who was the U.S. ambassador to the UN from 2006 to 2008. Wallace also reminds Twitter CEO Dick Costolo of the cruel persecution of opposition supporters who used the platform to publicly protest in the aftermath of the disputed 2009 presidential election. But the restriction of Internet freedom in Iran is also associated with brutal repression in other ways. Just last year, the well-known dissident blogger Sattar Beheshti was arrested and died in prison - apparently as a result of torture. The UANI activists are asking Twitter CEO Costolo how this fits with his own remarks praising Twitter's role in the 'Arab Spring' and declaring that the short message service could 'change the world' by giving a voice to 'people who have not previously had one.' Unlike the oppressed Iranian opposition, the Supreme Spiritual Leader used his Twitter account for rabble rousing. Thus, the letter quotes Khamenei's tweets to the protesters of the 'Arab Spring': 'The activists of the Islamic awakening must be vigilant against the unpleasant and horrific experience of Western lifestyle.' Or: 'Israelis a vile entity in the Middle East, which will undoubtedly be destroyed.'" http://t.uani.com/186x9Rc

Reuters: "The U.S. State Department on Wednesday renewed six-month waivers on Iran sanctions for China, India and seven other economies in exchange for their agreeing to reduce purchases of oil from Iran. 'The United States and the international community stand shoulder to shoulder in maintaining pressure on the Iranian regime until it fully addresses concerns about its nuclear program,' Secretary of State John Kerry said in a statement. The waivers, which the State Department calls exceptions, mean that financial institutions in the consumer countries do not risk being cut off from the U.S. financial system for the next six months... Lawmakers in Congress also hope to pass legislation this year that could further limit Iran's oil sales and reduce Tehran's access to its foreign currency accounts, mostly held in euros. 'The grounds for an exception are clearly too loose,' Representative Eliot Engel, the top Democrat on the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee, said in a statement. He added the House could vote in coming weeks on legislation 'to tighten the standards for granting exceptions.' The other economies the State Department renewed waivers for were South Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Turkey and Taiwan. Japan and 10 EU countries got waivers earlier this year." http://t.uani.com/ZRPKwR

Reuters: "U.S. lawmakers are embarking this summer on a campaign to deal a deeper blow to Iran's diminishing oil exports, and while they are still working out the details, analysts say the ultimate goal could be a near total cut-off. Such an extreme goal would risk antagonizing China and India, the biggest remaining buyers of Iranian crude, and could push oil prices higher in a hit to the global economy... Both parties in the U.S. Congress are pressing for tougher sanctions, betting that a resurgence in U.S. oil output and signs of ample global supply will prevent prices from rising. Last month, during a House of Representatives committee meeting on a bill toughening sanctions, a new clause was inserted that for the first time would require importers to cut purchase of Iranian crude by a specific volume: 1 million barrels per day (bpd) within one year. But here's the catch: Iran's crude exports already fell to 700,000 bpd in May, raising questions about what the starting point for such a target would be. The new language has yet to be incorporated into the official text of the bill and may change. At the hearing, lawmakers said the measure was meant to cut shipments by two-thirds, suggesting last year's 1.5 million bpd export was the starting point and 500,000 bpd the goal." http://t.uani.com/190xWmi
Election Repression Toolkit    
Nuclear Program

Reuters: "Arab Gulf states sought reassurances from Iran at a U.N. nuclear agency meeting this week over the safety of its only atomic energy plant, which is located in an earthquake-prone coastal area, diplomats said on Thursday. The Bushehr facility on Iran's Gulf coast is a growing worry for nearby countries: if radiation ever does escape it could be blown over the Gulf to Qatar's capital Doha and the main oil exporting ports of the United Arab Emirates. Tehran has repeatedly rejected safety worries about the Russian-built reactor, which began operations in 2011 after decades of delays. The United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia raised the issue during a closed-door June 3-7 meeting of the 35-nation Board of Governors of the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the diplomats said... 'What the reactor does is create what is referred to as a plutonium path to potential weapons-grade material for a nuclear device,' U.S. IAEA envoy Joseph Macmanus said yesterday in Vienna. Iran already possess the ability to pursue a separate path toward nuclear weapons by enriching uranium." http://t.uani.com/1b8qHVX

June 14 Elections

AP: "The eight candidates running in Iran's June 14 election for president took radically different stands on personal freedoms, women's rights and censorship in the country's second round of televised debates Wednesday. Moderates vowed to loosen restrictions and hard-liners backed strong state intervention in people' lives. The four-hour debate focused on cultural issues. A previous round covered the economy, and an upcoming debate will be devoted to foreign policy and security... During the debate, centrist Hasan Rowhani said he would form a women's affairs ministry if elected, but Saeed Jalili, Iran's top nuclear negotiator, said the best job for a woman is to be a mother. Pro-reform candidate Mohammad Reza Aref insisted that Iranians have social and cultural rights under the constitution, complaining that the government looks at rights as a privilege it can deny, while imposing censorship at will." http://t.uani.com/111hev2

Bloomberg: "Two Iranian presidential candidates used the second debate before next week's election to call for greater press freedom and social liberties. All eight candidates took part in the program organized and aired by Iran's state television, with the aim of introducing their views on society and culture. While some underlined the importance of Iran's 'Islamic culture' being supported or celebrated, others used the time allotted to criticize what they described as harmful restrictions on the population. 'Let people have more freedom, let's not intervene so much in their lives,' said Hassan Rohani, a cleric who was Iran's chief nuclear negotiator in the early 2000s. 'Cultural issues must be solved through culture itself. Police should be the last resort.' With the election looming on June 14, Rohani criticized the seizing of satellite dishes by the police, saying it was an 'attack against people's privacy.' The government had brought about a brain-drain by discouraging those studying abroad from returning home, creating in effect 'a one-way road,' he said." http://t.uani.com/13I1EGU

NYT: "Qum, home to some of Iran's most influential clerics, is not just Iran's holiest city, but one of its most powerful, a Shiite Vatican in the desert that can make or break any Iranian political career. So it is not surprising that it has become a destination recently for almost all of the candidates in next week's presidential election, seeking to sip from the cocktail of money, politics and religion that the city represents. While the eight presidential candidates, carefully vetted by the government, all hold roughly the same views on the major issues, they need to make sure they have support from Qum. 'The top clergymen from Qum are among the few in the country who can openly criticize all politicians if they feel like it,' said Farshad Ghorbanpour, an Iranian journalist. 'Seeking their allegiance not only prevents public reprimands, but also means the support of their followers.'" http://t.uani.com/11n5YsV

Terrorism

Reuters: "A Nigerian court charged four Lebanese men suspected of having links to the Islamist militant group Hezbollah with terrorism and possession of illegal arms on Wednesday, after authorities said they found heavy weapons in one of their homes... The military said last week that the weapons were to be used in attacks on American and Israeli targets... The security source told Reuters authorities were also looking into the possibility of a link to Iran. An alleged member of Iran's Revolutionary Guard and a Nigerian accomplice were sentenced to five years in prison earlier this month over an illegal shipment of mortars and rockets seized in Lagos in 2010." http://t.uani.com/13cUeuK

Human Rights

Fox News: "Iran just doesn't want to leave the Stone Age. The Islamic Republic's Sharia law-controlled judiciary dismissed the concerns of critics of its barbaric penal system and voted to retain stoning as the penalty for sex outside of marriage. The move was bad news for the estimated 10 women and men who human rights advocates say currently face death by stoning, as well as another 15 women Amnesty International says face the possibility of being pelted to death with rocks. 'The death by stoning provision not only contravenes international human rights standards and has no place in any penal code in any country, but also puts on full display the Iranian government's barbaric application of Islamic law which most negatively affects the rights of women and minorities in the country,' Dwight Bashir, deputy director for policy at the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, told FoxNews.com." http://t.uani.com/13cUAS4

AFP: "Iran is again cracking down on people with pet dogs, viewed as unclean in Islam, but Soroush Mobaraki says sales are booming despite fears the pooches might be 'arrested' and their owners fined. This veterinary pharmacologist, sitting in the small Tehran pet shop he owns, said 'there has been a sharp increase in demand for dogs in recent years. We sell 15 to 20 dogs a month, but I know some other traders who sell many more,' said Mobaraki, aged 34. For decades, keeping dogs as pets was a rarity and thus tolerated in Iran, where the Islamic beliefs cherished by the vast majority of traditional Iranians consider dogs as 'najis', or unclean. Guard dogs, sheep dogs and hounds have always been acceptable, but the soaring number of pets acquired by a middle class keen to imitate Western culture has alarmed the authorities in recent years. They have now criminalised walking dogs in public, or driving them around the city." http://t.uani.com/15E0EVp

Opinion & Analysis

Ray Takeyh in LAT: "Iran's presidential election is again inviting speculation about which candidate can nudge the Islamic Republic toward moderation and pragmatism. Such conjectural games miss the point that the theocratic state is defined by an ideology that demonizes the West and relies on conspiracies to explain global affairs. The guardians of the Islamist state are emphatic in their belief that America harbors an enduring animosity not just toward their state but to the Muslim world. Its next president, drawn from the ranks of regime loyalists, is unlikely to temper this noxious political culture. In pursuit of a diplomatic solution to the conundrum of Iran, Washington and its allies persistently ignore the fact that they are dealing with a deeply deformed political state. Its clerical oligarchs routinely spin conspiracy tales about how the real perpetrators of the 9/11 terrorist attacks have yet to be unmasked. This has to be considered a 'sensitive' response compared to the Iranian elites' denials of the Holocaust and depictions of the Jewish community. It is the conceit of foreign policy realism that rhetoric is meaningless, and pragmatism is the essence of the game of nations. After all, the leading proponents of this school suggest, Soviet leaders and China's Mao Tse-tung indulged in rash rhetoric and yet proved judicious custodians of their nations' nuclear arsenals. Whatever Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's crimes may be, he is neither as reckless as Nikita Khrushchev nor a mass murderer like Mao. If the United States can contain one and celebrate making peace with the other, it is said, then it should cast aside Iran's troublesome statements and proceed with diplomacy... In Khamenei's telling, the Middle East today is immersed in a struggle pitting the forces of Islamism against America and its satraps. This is a conflict that is playing itself out in slums of Lebanon, in the forgotten frontiers of Iraq and, most dramatically, in Syria. For the clerical rulers this is an existential struggle, as Iran's divine mandate can only be redeemed in a region unhooked from the American empire. Thus, when Khamenei speaks of the glory of resistance and America's dark plots, he is not seeking to mobilize some abstract constituency but expressing his genuine worldview. Unlike the tired Soviet revolutionaries of the late 20th century who cloaked themselves in rhetoric they increasingly did not believe, Khamenei is sincere when he speaks of emancipating the Middle East from the clutches of the 'Great Satan.' Iran's nuclear ambitions can only be understood in this context, as the clerical state perceives that it can best enhance its prestige, protect its allies and displace its adversaries armed with the ultimate weapon... For the international community to persist with its diplomacy, it must set aside Tehran's rhetorical fulminations, explain away its various transgressions and convince itself that there is an untapped reservoir of pragmatism somewhere in the recesses of the Islamic Republic that can be harnessed through a clever mixture of sanctions and dialogue. A Washington in search of an Iranian interlocutor must cast Khamenei as yet another despotic ruler whose words belie his essential realism. But after nearly a decade of delusory diplomacy, it may be time to ask: What if Iran's supreme leader actually means what he says?" http://t.uani.com/122fdnk

Firuz Kazemzadeh in WashPost: "'I've never seen my mother so heartbroken as when she returned from her visit to Evin prison to see my sister, Fariba,' Iraj Kamalabadi recounts of his mother's visit with his sister, Fariba Kamalabadi, in Iran. It had been four years since his mother and sister had seen each other. Kamalabadi explained that during his mother's visit, every minute of waiting felt like a year. Finally, a rough voice called, 'Visitors for Fariba Kamalabadi, come forward.' As Kamalabadi's mother eagerly rushed forward, she did not see her daughter and began to panic, but was called back by her granddaughter to a window with an unfamiliar, but smiling face. Behind the glass sat an aged lady with white hair, pronounced cheekbones, and a face full of dark spots. This was her daughter. In total shock and disbelief, she broke into uncontrollable tears. May 14, 2013 marks five years since seven of Iran's Baha'is, including Fariba Kamalabadi, were arrested, tried behind closed doors, and sentenced to 20 years in prison. Their crime: informal leadership of a community, the largest non-Muslim religious minority in the country, outlawed by the government of the Islamic Republic as a subversive and 'deviant sect.' Accounts in Iranian government-controlled news media said that the seven members of the Yaran-i-Iran ('friends of Iran'), as the group was known - Mrs. Fariba Kamalabadi, Mr. Jamaloddin Khanjani, Mr. Afif Naeimi, Mr. Saeid Rezaie, Mrs. Mahvash Sabet, Mr. Behrouz Tavakkoli, and Mr. Vahid Tizfahm - were formally charged with espionage, propaganda activities against the Islamic order, the establishment of an illegal administration, cooperation with Israel, sending secret documents outside the country, acting against the security of the country, and corruption on earth. They categorically denied all the charges. As the legal process moved forward, the seven Yaran were denied access to lawyers for more than a year and were only given one hour with their counsel before their trial began. They were convicted without the government producing a shred of evidence of their supposed guilt... It is important to keep the searchlight of truth on Iran and, while paying attention to nuclear and other vital issues, not to close one's eyes to the repressive policies and actions of the Iranian government directed against its own people. While it is unclear how many more times Kamalabadi's mother will be able to visit her, it is clear that this injustice cannot go on. Five years is five years too many." http://t.uani.com/190O7Qk

Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com

United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons.  UANI is an issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of nuclear weapons.

No comments:

Post a Comment