John
Esposito: 'Islamophobia' a 'Social Cancer' in America
by Andrew Harrod
Independent Journal Review
October 21, 2016
|
|
Share:
|
Be the first of
your friends to like this.
[IJR title is "Why the War on 'Islamophobia' Distracts Us from
Legitimate Terrorism Concerns." The text below differs slightly from
IJR's.]
John Esposito, the Saudi-funded
director of Georgetown University's Bridge
Initiative, is on a mission to convince the world that
"Islamophobia has metastasized" as a "social cancer in
America" one academic conference at a time. Speaking alongside his
protégé, Dalia
Mogahed, Bridge Initiative Senior Fellow Engy
Abdelkader, and others at the September 22 "Islamophobia
in Focus: Muslims and the Media" conference in Washington, DC,
the notorious Islamism
apologist pitched this message to an audience of about 130.
Much of the discussion revolved around the well-worn canard that media
distortion inflates concerns about Islamist terrorism. "While
studies show that a greater security risk emanates from white
supremacists, rightwing extremists, and ultra-separatist groups, both here
in the United States as well as in Europe," Abdelkader told the
attendees, "when we hear about terrorism in the news, it tends to be
in the context of Muslims and Islam."
In fact, this claim,
which originated with a 2015 New America Foundation (NAF) study of
American domestic terrorism, has long since been debunked.
Among other flaws, the study's finding that rightwing terrorists have
claimed more lives in America after September 11, 2001 than Islamist
terrorists ignores the relatively miniscule size of the country's Muslim
population. Additionally, recent massacres such as in Orlando, Florida,
arguably American's largest mass
shooting, have increased the NAF's latest
tabulation to 94 deaths from jihadists versus 48 from rightwing
extremists since 9/11.
The 2016
Europol report on terrorism in the European Union (EU) directly
contradicts Abdelkader's claim. In 2015, 150 people died as a result of
jihadist terrorist attacks in the EU. Accordingly, the "main concern
reported by EU member states continues to be jihadist terrorism."
Alleging negative media bias against Islam and Muslims, Esposito
called for putting "constructive stories" in the media that
"contextualize more." He referenced "hard data that says
that Muslims are politically, economically, socially, and educationally
integrated" in the U.S., although the real statistical record is
mixed. While income and educational levels of Muslim Americans are encouraging,
they have disproportionately
high incarceration rates. In contrast, Europe's larger Muslim populations
are plagued by high incarceration rates, high
unemployment, and poverty.
Esposito struck an
Orwellian note when he announced that, like racism, the term "Islamophobia"
should signal to any critic of Islam that "what you are doing is
unacceptable in society." This phobia exists when the
"irrationality and the fear" is "of Islam itself, the
religion," he maintained, objecting to the many Americans who
"buy into the line that Islam is a particularly violent
religion."
Yet, Esposito's personal recollections suggested the value of
examining Islam skeptically rather than through rose-colored lenses. He
noted that Islam and Muslims were "were virtually invisible" in
American society and academia before Iran's 1979 revolution, such that
"very few people knew who Ayatollah Khomeini was, let alone what was
going on in Iran." Esposito's friends "were the top experts on
Iran," but "they never looked at the vitality of Islam in the
modern period until they went to do research on their dissertation and
happened to do field work in Iran." Spurious accusations of
"Islamophobia" will only increase the chance of future
academics repeating this pattern and not asking whether Islam as
practiced in the Islamic Republic of Iran might be a particularly violent
creed.
Esposito himself has learned little since the Iranian revolution's
violent outrages perpetrated in Islam's name. Repeating a talking point from
previous presentations, he decried that, in the U.S., "Islam has
been seen through the lens of the Iranian revolution," including
"Death to America" chants and the Iranian hostage crisis. This
supposedly "distorted lens" affects American policy so that
"it makes it a lot easier to go along with a coup in Egypt . . .
rather than saying, if you don't like your government, you have
elections." He never explained whether elections under Egypt's
Muslim Brotherhood government would have been more meaningful than those
under Iran's theocratic tyranny.
Esposito's peddling of discredited theories continued while answering
audience questions, telling one attendee that "most Jews are not
Semites, and indeed many of them are from Europe." In fact, scholarly
research and DNA analysis
has demonstrated that most Jews around the world trace their origins to
Israel and have a common ancestry. This includes European Jews, who do
not descend from medieval Khazar converts, as false theories claim.
Esposito condemns "statements that brushstroke an entire
population" of 1.6 billion Muslims worldwide, yet has positioned
himself as a leading opponent of critical inquiry into Islam. Charges of
"Islamophobia" can only have a chilling effect upon vitally
needed discernment between Muslims seeking personal piety and Islamists
pursing dangerous sectarian political agendas. The losers will be Muslims
and non-Muslims alike.
Andrew E. Harrod is a freelance researcher and writer who holds a
PhD from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy and a JD from George
Washington University Law School. He is a fellow with the Lawfare
Project; follow him on twitter at @AEHarrod. He wrote this essay for Campus Watch, a project
of the Middle East Forum.
This
text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral
whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author,
date, place of publication, and original URL.
Related Items
|
No comments:
Post a Comment