In this mailing:
- Bassam Tawil: Palestinians:
Abbas's "Culture of Peace"
- Maria Polizoidou: More Lies from
the UN
by Bassam Tawil • May 8, 2017 at
5:00 am
- Thanks
to Abbas's falsehoods, his media continues to this day
dishonestly to talk about "Jewish invaders and settlers
storming" Islamic and Christian holy sites in Jerusalem.
This and this alone is the source of the knife and car-ramming
attacks against Israelis.
- Perhaps
by a "culture of peace" Abbas means calling -- as he
and his top officials regularly do -- Israel an apartheid and
racist state. Or maybe "culture of peace" means
calling all Jews "occupiers" and "colonists"
-- or denouncing and threatening Palestinian children who play
soccer with Israeli kids. Or naming schools and electoral
lists after convicted murderers?
- Under
Abbas, anti-Israel incitement and indoctrination is a business
that has expanded exponentially. It has, in fact, grown to the
point that a new generation has been raised on the
glorification of jihadists -- a generation impatient to draw
yet more Jewish blood. If this is Abbas's "culture of
peace," one has to wonder what he would consider a
culture of war?
US
President Donald Trump meets with Palestinian Authority President
Mahmoud Abbas in the White House, on May 3, 2016. (Image source:
White House video screenshot)
Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas
may soon be known for his sense of humor. Like many Palestinians,
Abbas believes that Westerners will swallow his lies wholesale.
Abbas, for instance, ended his May 3 meeting with US President
Donald Trump with the following whopper: "We are raising our
youth, our children, our grandchildren on a culture of peace."
Abbas did not provide further details about the
"culture of peace" upon which Palestinian children are
being raised. Nor did anyone bother to ask Abbas or any member of
his entourage to provide examples of the "culture of
peace" in Palestinian society. Yet major Western media outlets
were quick to publish Abbas's unmistakable lie.
by Maria Polizoidou • May 8, 2017
at 4:00 am
- If
the UN honestly wants peace, then it must accept that the
modern Jewish state is the tugboat that will pull the whole
Middle East into the 21st century. Rejecting the
historic Jewish legitimacy in Jerusalem, is rejecting the
quintessence of peace.
- In
historical terms, the modern Jewish state has greater
historical legitimacy than most modern European states – and
far more than at least the five Middle Eastern states
artificially created out of the 1916 Sykes-Picot agreement:
the newborn countries of Greater Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and
Iraq. In Europe, what we now call Germany and France only
appeared in the historical space of the Western world in the 3rd
Century AD.
- Or
could it be that secretly the United Nations does not want
"peace" but instead the obliteration of Israel and
its replacement by another Islamist state?
An aerial
view of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, and much of Jerusalem's Old
City. (Image source: Andrew Shiva / Wikipedia)
You can run away from history, but you cannot hide
from it. History does not care about your religious beliefs, your
political beliefs or your political correctness. History records
facts, regardless of how you feel about them.
UNESCO's latest resolution about Jerusalem, which
denies the Jews' and Israel's legacy over its historical capital,
Jerusalem, is yet another proof of the UN's corrupt decline. It not
only offends the historical truth and archeology of the Jewish
people. It also offends the Greek people, and all Christians, who
for thousands of years have also had ties with the area and the
nation of Jews. As it also offends the foundations of Greek
Orthodox Christianity, the Greek government -- to is honor -- voted
against this hallucinatory UNESCO resolution.
Here are more facts: The King of Sparta, Arius I,
who lived between 309-267 B.C., sent a letter to Onias the First,
the High Priest of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem:
|
No comments:
Post a Comment