In this mailing:
- Bassam Tawil: The Candy Bar
that Blew Barghouti's Cover
- Majid Rafizadeh: Links Between
Islamism and Executions
by Bassam Tawil • May 10, 2017 at
5:00 am
- Tellingly,
although Nasser Abu Bakr's conflict of interest has been
reported several times, his spectacular breach of journalistic
ethics does not seem to bother his employers at Agence
France-Presse (AFP). Worse, it calls into serious question
AFP's professional ethics.
- Let
us be clear on this: Abu Bakr and his PA friends are demanding
that the Israeli and international media refrain from
reporting anything offensive about the Palestinians. That is
censorship -- not to mention shock-troop thuggery.
- Since
his appointment as chairman of the Palestinian Journalists
Syndicate (PJS), Abu Bakr has spearheaded a campaign to
boycott Israeli journalists and media organizations. He has
repeatedly accused Israeli journalists of serving as an
"arm" of the Israeli military authorities and
government. Ironically, it is Abu Bakr and his PJS who serve
as part of the Palestinian Authority (PA) leadership
establishment and do not conceal their role as officials.
A
screenshot from a video showing imprisoned Fatah leader Marwan
Barghouti, who is leading a "hunger strike," secretly
eating a candy bar in the bathroom of his prison cell. (Image
source: Israel Prisons Service)
The Palestinian Journalists Syndicate (PJS), a body
dominated by loyalists to Palestinian Authority (PA) President
Mahmoud Abbas, has resumed its incitement against Israeli media
outlets and journalists.
On May 7, Israeli authorities released a video
showing imprisoned Fatah leader Marwan Barghouti, who is leading a
"hunger strike" of more than 1,000 inmates held in
Israeli prisons, secretly eating a candy bar in the bathroom of his
prison cell. Israeli media outlets and journalists, like many of
their Western colleagues, reported on the video, which has
seriously embarrassed Barghouti and many other Palestinians.
The prisoners' "hunger strike" is not
about torture or denial of medical treatment. The prisoners seek
expanded visitation rights, better access to public phones and more
access to higher education.
But Barghouti, who began leading the "hunger
strike" on April 17, has more on his mind than incarceration
privileges.
by Majid Rafizadeh • May 10, 2017
at 4:00 am
- People
have, it seems, often been arrested or detained on the basis
of a rumor; then convicted without trial, counsel or often
even the chance to mount a defense.
- As
Amnesty International points out, "In many countries
where people were sentenced to death or executed, the
proceedings did not meet international fair trial standards.
In some cases, this included the extraction of 'confessions'
through torture or other ill-treatment".
- The
laws under which these people are sentenced to death are often
not only vague and open to interpretation. Charges that
warrant the death penalty, for instance, include being
"corrupt on earth", "enemies of Allah on
Earth", or alleged "crimes against chastity".
What exactly does "corrupt on earth" or
"enemies of Allah on Earth" mean?
In
Pakistan, Asia Bibi (pictured with two of her five children), a
Christian, sits on death row for "blasphemy." Asia's
"crime" was to use the same water glass as her Muslim
co-workers. "You defiled our water," the Muslim women
told her.
Just how strict and brutal it is to enforce Islamic
law, sharia, has now been revealed by Amnesty International.
Amnesty's study, which details the number of reported
executions around the world, clearly maps out the most at-risk
populations. Lands ruled predominantly by sharia are apparently the
most vulnerable to multitudes of executions without fair trials. At
the top of the list, with the most executions, are those nations
that enforce Islamic sharia law. Despite many human rights
violations, these nations, apparently undeterred, continue to
execute their citizens.
Sharia makes those in authority infallible and
untouchable. Therefore, whatever the government or those in power
deem to be "just" can be carried out without question or
consequence. Under sharia law and the Islamic penal code,
executions can be carried out in sickening forms. Those convicted
may be beheaded, hanged, stoned, or shot to death.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment