In this
mailing:
- Douglas Murray: UK: War on
Free Speech at the National Union of Students
- Shoshana Bryen: Why Is the
US Still Funding Palestinian Terrorism?
by Douglas Murray
• April 19, 2017 at 5:00 am
- It is interesting to
consider what would happen were anyone to demand the same
standards of these campaigners against free speech as they
demand of others. The people who make such claims rarely if ever
exercise the same civic hygiene they demand of everybody else.
- If it furthered their
political and other goals then Malia Bouattia and the National
Union of Students (NUS) would most likely be currently calling
for arrests and prosecutions for incitement, "hate
speech" and more. Of course, nobody could be so
ill-mannered as to play this political game back at them. But if
they were to, they would certainly find far greater evidence of
cause and effect than Bouattia and her colleagues have produced
to date in their war on free speech.
- It could be said that
Bouattia engaged in "hate speech" as well as
"racist speech" when she said the words she did. It
could further be claimed that what Bouattia said in fact
constituted "incitement" and an "open invitation
to violence". It could be argued that the words which came
out of her lips led directly to a Palestinian man thinking that
a British student could be killed on a tram in Jerusalem in a
legitimate act of "resistance" against a
representative of a "Zionist outpost."
Malia Bouattia, the president of the UK National Union
of Students, refers to acts of terrorism against Israelis as
"resistance". (Image source: NUS press office)
The great
effort of the present-day censors on campuses across the West is to
make speech synonymous with action. Campaigners against free
expression claim that words not only "wound" people but
actually "kill". They claim that people associated with any
group being criticised are not only suffering a verbal "assault"
but an actual "physical" assault. Those who campaign
against any and all criticism of Islamists, for instance, not only
claim that the attacks are "Islamophobic" and target
"all Muslims". They also claim that such words cause
violence -- including violence against any and all Muslims.
One of the
notable things about their objection is that the people who make such
claims rarely if ever exercise the same civic hygiene they demand of
everybody else. It is interesting to consider what would happen were
anyone to demand the same standards of these campaigners as they
demand of others.
by Shoshana Bryen
• April 19, 2017 at 4:00 am
- Jamil Tamimi, 57, knew
that if he committed an act of terror, he would be lionized by
the Palestinian Authority (PA) and -- perhaps more importantly
-- that, if he were killed or sent to prison, his family would
be taken care of financially.
- "The PLO
Commission was new only in name. The PLO body would have the
same responsibilities and pay the exact same amounts of
salaries to prisoners... PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas retained
overall supervision of the PLO Commission." — Palestinian
Media Watch.
- In 2016 Bashar
Masalha, who murdered U.S. Army veteran Taylor Force and wounded
several others, was hailed on official PA media outlets as a
"martyr." A few months later, Abbas said on PA TV,
"We welcome every drop of blood spilled in Jerusalem....
With the help of Allah, every martyr will be in heaven, and
every wounded will get his reward."
- The U.S. government
should let the PLO and PA know that we are onto their game.
Disincentivizing terrorism by closing the PLO office in
Washington would be a good first step.
British
exchange student Hannah Bladon was stabbed to death on a Jerusalem
light rail train last Friday. Her murderer was identified as an East
Jerusalem resident who had previously been convicted of molesting his
daughter and had tried to commit suicide. Failing at that, he
apparently opted for terrorism, on the assumption that the police
would kill him. They didn't. "This," the Shin Bet said in a
statement, "is another case, out of many, where a Palestinian
who is suffering from personal, mental or moral issues chooses to
carry out a terror attack in order to find a way out of their
problems."
"Suicide
by cop" is not unheard of, but the real incentives need to be
spelled out.
Jamil Tamimi,
57, knew that if he committed an act of terror, he would be lionized
by the Palestinian Authority (PA) and -- perhaps more importantly --
that, if he were killed or sent to prison, his family would be taken
care of financially.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment