In this
mailing:
by Judith Bergman
• March 30, 2017 at 5:00 am
- Human Rights Watch, an
organization that is supposed to look out for victims of human
rights abuses, not abusers of human rights is begging US decision
makers not to designate the Muslim Brotherhood -- which, if it
had its way, would take away everyone's human rights and
substitute them with sharia law -- a foreign terrorist
organization.
- "Allah is our
objective; the Prophet is our leader; the Quran is our law;
Jihad is our way; dying in the way of Allah is our highest
hope". — Muslim Brotherhood motto.
- Conveniently, Hamas --
which according to article two of its charter, is "one of
the wings of Moslem Brotherhood in Palestine" -- is, it
seems, working on a new charter. The new charter would declare
that Hamas is not a part of the Muslim Brotherhood,
despite its always having been so. That way, is the Muslim
Brotherhood's "narrative" of newfound
"nonviolence" suddenly supposed to become believable?
Left: The emblem of the Muslim Brotherhood. Right:
While being hosted by the State Department on a visit to Washington
in January 2015, Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood judge Waleed Sharaby
flashed the organization's four-finger "Rabia" sign.
Gehad
el-Haddad, official spokesman for the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), is on
a mission to rewrite the terrorist and radical history of the MB. He
seems to be doing this for the consumption of naïve Americans. These
seem only too willing to believe -- in the name of tolerance,
diversity and trying to be non-judgmental -- that an organization
whose ultimate goal is the supreme reign of Islamic sharia law
everywhere -- if necessary through violent jihad -- could possibly
value anything even approximating equality and the rule of
(non-sharia) law.
"We are
not terrorists," wrote a political activist for the MB, Gehad
el-Haddad, in a recent article in the New York Times.
by Denis MacEoin
• March 30, 2017 at 4:30 am
- It has from the
beginning been designed to denounce Israel as an illegal state,
all under the cover of supposed neutral academic inquiry.
- It is not, however, in
the least surprising that an Irish government would pass a
motion like that so wholeheartedly. After all, links with the
PLO and other terrorist groups were connived at or even
encouraged by the Irish government itself.
- The conference put
itself in the welcoming hands of the city council, a body
thoroughly in agreement with the aims of the event, to find
spurious legal arguments for the delegitimization and eventual
destruction of Israel.
The City Hall of Cork, Ireland. (Image source: Klaus
Foehl/Wikimedia Commons)
Readers may remember
a controversy reported in January. It was proposed that an
international "academic" conference about the legitimacy of
Israel would take place in University College Cork in the Republic of
Ireland. There have been several developments in this sorry
enterprise since then.
What the
conference, which goes under the revealing title, "International
Law and the State of Israel: Legitimacy, Responsibility and
Exceptionalism", was about may be summed up in a few sentences.
It has from the beginning been designed to denounce Israel as an
illegal state, all under the cover of supposed neutral academic
inquiry. The organizers had previously tried to hold the event at
Britain's Southampton University and, reportedly, other European
universities, each time without success.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment